Rachel Henderson

539 total citations
26 papers, 347 citations indexed

About

Rachel Henderson is a scholar working on Education, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Henderson has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 347 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Education, 7 papers in Safety Research and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Rachel Henderson's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (14 papers), Career Development and Diversity (7 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers). Rachel Henderson is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (14 papers), Career Development and Diversity (7 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers). Rachel Henderson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and China. Rachel Henderson's co-authors include John Stewart, Adrienne L. Traxler, Gay Stewart, Rebecca Lindell, Marcos D. Caballero, Paul M. Miller, Jason B. Mattingley, Edgar Fuller, James Wells and Ranmalee Eramudugolla and has published in prestigious journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Appetite and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Henderson

25 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Henderson United States 11 212 98 94 68 35 26 347
Alexandru Maries United States 10 216 1.0× 107 1.1× 100 1.1× 60 0.9× 28 0.8× 25 297
Eleanor W. Close United States 9 199 0.9× 45 0.5× 46 0.5× 108 1.6× 25 0.7× 27 285
Gay Stewart United States 9 199 0.9× 60 0.6× 50 0.5× 65 1.0× 36 1.0× 15 269
Amy M. Masnick United States 11 207 1.0× 41 0.4× 46 0.5× 167 2.5× 28 0.8× 29 357
Hunter G. Close United States 11 327 1.5× 86 0.9× 26 0.3× 200 2.9× 39 1.1× 33 450
George O’Brien United States 7 288 1.4× 39 0.4× 40 0.4× 126 1.9× 22 0.6× 20 357
Amy D. Robertson United States 13 339 1.6× 36 0.4× 17 0.2× 190 2.8× 29 0.8× 60 410
Christoph von Rhöneck Germany 5 237 1.1× 64 0.7× 15 0.2× 124 1.8× 59 1.7× 7 323
Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü Türkiye 9 185 0.9× 31 0.3× 57 0.6× 84 1.2× 14 0.4× 27 285
Sunyono Sunyono Indonesia 8 385 1.8× 43 0.4× 18 0.2× 112 1.6× 55 1.6× 68 462

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Henderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Henderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Henderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Henderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Henderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Henderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Henderson. The network helps show where Rachel Henderson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Henderson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Henderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Henderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Henderson. Rachel Henderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Henderson, Rachel, et al.. (2025). A latent class analysis of negative emotional eating in bariatric surgery candidates. Appetite. 208. 107907–107907. 3 indexed citations
2.
Barnhart, Wesley R., et al.. (2025). Characterizing emotional eating by valence, over-vs under-eating, and contextual factors: A latent profile analysis. Appetite. 215. 108235–108235. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pollard, Benjamin, et al.. (2023). Survey of physics reasoning on uncertainty concepts in experiments: An assessment of measurement uncertainty for introductory physics labs. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 19(2). 7 indexed citations
4.
Henderson, Rachel, et al.. (2022). Mediating role of personality in the relation of gender to self-efficacy in physics and mathematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 18(1). 4 indexed citations
5.
Stewart, John, et al.. (2021). Mediational effect of prior preparation on performance differences of students underrepresented in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 17(1). 17 indexed citations
6.
Wells, James, et al.. (2021). Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 17(1). 9 indexed citations
7.
Pollard, Benjamin, et al.. (2021). Introductory physics lab instructors’ perspectives on measurement uncertainty. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 17(1). 17 indexed citations
8.
Henderson, Rachel, et al.. (2020). A longitudinal exploration of students� beliefs about experimental physics. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 214–219. 2 indexed citations
9.
Stewart, John, et al.. (2020). Differences in the predictive power of pretest scores of students underrepresented in physics. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 226–232. 1 indexed citations
10.
Henderson, Rachel, Vashti Sawtelle, & Jayson Nissen. (2020). Gender & Self-Efficacy: A Call to Physics Educators. The Physics Teacher. 58(5). 345–348. 12 indexed citations
11.
Yang, Jie, et al.. (2020). Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 16(1). 14 indexed citations
12.
Henderson, Rachel, et al.. (2019). Rural and First Generation Performance Differences on the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
13.
Stewart, John, et al.. (2019). Mining Students Pre-instruction Beliefs for Improved Learning. 26506. 1–10. 5 indexed citations
14.
Henderson, Rachel, et al.. (2018). The Importance of Belonging and Self-Efficacy in Engineering Identity. AERA Open. 3 indexed citations
15.
Henderson, Rachel & John Stewart. (2018). Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 172–175. 5 indexed citations
16.
Holland, Lisa, et al.. (2018). Enhancing research for undergraduates through a nanotechnology training program that utilizes analytical and bioanalytical tools. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 410(24). 6041–6050. 2 indexed citations
17.
Traxler, Adrienne L., et al.. (2018). Gender fairness within the Force Concept Inventory. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 14(1). 68 indexed citations
18.
Henderson, Rachel, et al.. (2017). Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 13(2). 37 indexed citations
19.
Eramudugolla, Ranmalee, Rachel Henderson, & Jason B. Mattingley. (2010). Effects of audio–visual integration on the detection of masked speech and non-speech sounds. Brain and Cognition. 75(1). 60–66. 18 indexed citations
20.
Henderson, Rachel, et al.. (1992). EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF STRENGTH TRAINING WITH FREE WEIGHTS IN PREPUBESCENTS TO EARLY POST PUDESCENTS. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 24(Supplement). S82–S82. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026