Philip Little

20 total papers · 630 total citations
12 papers, 423 citations indexed

About

Philip Little is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Little has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 423 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Strategy and Management, 6 papers in Accounting and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Philip Little's work include Corporate Identity and Reputation (4 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers). Philip Little is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Identity and Reputation (4 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers). Philip Little collaborates with scholars based in United States. Philip Little's co-authors include Beverly L. Little, Gary Jones, H. David Robison, Cliff T. Ragsdale, Beth Jones, Andrew F. Seila, Amita Goyal Chin and Robert B. Welker and has published in prestigious journals such as Corporate Reputation Review, Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance and Academy of strategic management journal.

In The Last Decade

Philip Little

12 papers receiving 365 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Little 248 141 138 80 54 12 423
Daniel Z. Mack 206 0.8× 123 0.9× 97 0.7× 80 1.0× 108 2.0× 9 453
Irina Naoumova 172 0.7× 168 1.2× 105 0.8× 46 0.6× 41 0.8× 20 411
Déborah Philippe 286 1.2× 116 0.8× 113 0.8× 135 1.7× 72 1.3× 16 433
Leslie A. Toombs 151 0.6× 127 0.9× 96 0.7× 51 0.6× 70 1.3× 15 397
Juan Manuel de la Fuente-Sabaté 208 0.8× 178 1.3× 133 1.0× 43 0.5× 34 0.6× 9 387
Michael E. Valdez 177 0.7× 147 1.0× 115 0.8× 30 0.4× 73 1.4× 7 461
Stephen E. Clapham 150 0.6× 139 1.0× 169 1.2× 33 0.4× 64 1.2× 7 425
Gary Jones 178 0.7× 91 0.6× 77 0.6× 62 0.8× 48 0.9× 9 460
Xin Zhang 125 0.5× 172 1.2× 105 0.8× 30 0.4× 77 1.4× 22 420
Brian G. Nagy 123 0.5× 162 1.1× 145 1.1× 73 0.9× 83 1.5× 12 487

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Little

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Little's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Little with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Little more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Little

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Little. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Little. The network helps show where Philip Little may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Little

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Little. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Little based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Little. Philip Little is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026