Corporate Reputation Review

645 papers and 22.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 645 papers published in Corporate Reputation Review in the last decades have received a total of 22.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Corporate Reputation Review usually cover Strategy and Management (464 papers), Marketing (213 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (193 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Identity and Reputation (407 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (108 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Corporate Reputation Review are Charles J. Fombrun, W. Timothy Coombs, Christopher Foss, Kent Walker, Cees B.M. Van Riel, Michael L. Barnett, Sabrina Helm, Craig E. Carroll, Naomi A. Gardberg and D. B. Bromley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Corporate Reputation Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Corporate Reputation Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Corporate Reputation Review.

Countries where authors publish in Corporate Reputation Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Corporate Reputation Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Corporate Reputation Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corporate Reputation Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025