Phil Osborne

502 total citations
10 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Phil Osborne is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Phil Osborne has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 4 papers in Marketing and 2 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Phil Osborne's work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers). Phil Osborne is often cited by papers focused on Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers). Phil Osborne collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. Phil Osborne's co-authors include Brendan Gray, Sheelagh Matear, Tony C. Garrett, Rod B. McNaughton, Brian C. Imrie, David Ballantyne, Robert Aitken, John Williams, Robert E. Morgan and Oliver Bates and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Management and Service Industries Journal.

In The Last Decade

Phil Osborne

9 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Phil Osborne New Zealand	7	200	162	148	101	53	10	370
Cevahir Uzkurt Türkiye	8	141 0.7×	146 0.9×	160 1.1×	72 0.7×	36 0.7×	17	404
Teea Palo United Kingdom	8	146 0.7×	236 1.5×	213 1.4×	108 1.1×	31 0.6×	14	443
Qinghong Xie China	5	119 0.6×	120 0.7×	113 0.8×	111 1.1×	64 1.2×	9	359
Eva Böhm Germany	12	177 0.9×	208 1.3×	136 0.9×	93 0.9×	47 0.9×	14	368
Rachna Kumar United States	6	96 0.5×	79 0.5×	139 0.9×	80 0.8×	86 1.6×	8	341
Hung Tai Tsou Taiwan	7	144 0.7×	207 1.3×	201 1.4×	90 0.9×	106 2.0×	8	453
Éric Stevens France	7	104 0.5×	161 1.0×	162 1.1×	59 0.6×	49 0.9×	14	343
Corine Noordhoff Netherlands	4	142 0.7×	158 1.0×	195 1.3×	51 0.5×	27 0.5×	4	363
Masud Ibrahim Ghana	8	107 0.5×	113 0.7×	90 0.6×	82 0.8×	80 1.5×	19	330
Veronika Tarnovskaya Sweden	12	125 0.6×	144 0.9×	268 1.8×	93 0.9×	21 0.4×	27	432

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Osborne

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Osborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Osborne

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Osborne. The network helps show where Phil Osborne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phil Osborne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phil Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phil Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phil Osborne. Phil Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Mann, Samuel, et al.. (2018). Regenerative computing. 1–10. 10 indexed citations

2.

Osborne, Phil, et al.. (2016). The Report of the Curriculum Review Committee on a New Curriculum. 39(2). 155–155.

3.

Gray, Brendan, Sarah Stein, Phil Osborne, & Robert Aitken. (2013). Collaborative learning in a strategy education context. 8(1). 35–55. 4 indexed citations

4.

Gray, Brendan, Sarah Stein, Phil Osborne, & Robert Aitken. (2013). Collaborative learning in a marketing strategy education context. 1 indexed citations

5.

Osborne, Phil & David Ballantyne. (2012). The paradigmatic pitfalls of customer-centric marketing. Marketing Theory. 12(2). 155–172. 22 indexed citations

6.

Aitken, Robert, David Ballantyne, Phil Osborne, & John Williams. (2006). Introduction to the special issue on the service-dominant logic of marketing: insights from The Otago Forum. Marketing Theory. 6(3). 275–280. 44 indexed citations

7.

Deans, Kenneth R., et al.. (2003). Web Marketing Practices of Service Providers. Service Industries Journal. 23(3). 82–102. 9 indexed citations

8.

McNaughton, Rod B., Phil Osborne, & Brian C. Imrie. (2002). Market‐oriented value creation in service firms. European Journal of Marketing. 36(9/10). 990–1002. 81 indexed citations

9.

Matear, Sheelagh, Phil Osborne, Tony C. Garrett, & Brendan Gray. (2002). How does market orientation contribute to service firm performance?. European Journal of Marketing. 36(9/10). 1058–1075. 157 indexed citations

10.

McNaughton, Rod B., et al.. (2001). Market Orientation and Firm Value. Journal of Marketing Management. 17(5-6). 521–542. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact