Peter Schreiber

702 citations
19 papers · 366 indexed · h-index 6
Topics
History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers)Architecture and Art History Studies (2 papers)
Partner nations
GermanyUnited States

In The Last Decade

Peter Schreiber

15 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Peter Schreiber
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 295
  • Education 174
  • Statistics and Probability 57
  • Language and Linguistics 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
Replace Linda Lysynchuk with:
Linda Lysynchuk Canada
Priscilla A. Drum United States
J. Lloyd Eldredge United States
Wayne H. Slater United States
Laura Gould United States
Regina Boulware‐Gooden United States
Judith A. Scott United States
Ragnhild Söderbergh Sweden
M. Jean Greenlaw United States
J. Richard Gentry United States
Peter Schreiber relative to Linda Lysynchuk Canada Linda Lysynchuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Linda Lysynchuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schreiber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schreiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schreiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schreiber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schreiber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schreiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schreiber. The network helps show where Peter Schreiber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Schreiber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Schreiber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Schreiber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Schreiber. Peter Schreiber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 12
2 5
3 3
4 0
5 1
6 1
7 3
8 3
9 1
10 4
11 2
12 118
13 32
14 166
15 3
16
Arabic Topicalization: Alternative Approaches.
0
17
English sentence adverbs : a transformational analysis
2
18 10
19 0

About Peter Schreiber

Peter Schreiber is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers) and Architecture and Art History Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (295 citations), Statistics and Probability (57 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations). Peter Schreiber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles Read, Christoph J. Scriba, Frank Anshen, Renate Strohmeier and Reinhard Siegmund‐Schultze. Their work appears in journals such as Language, Theory Into Practice and Annals of Dyslexia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026