Peter Moran
Impact in
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Business Strategy and Innovation
-
- Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Papers in
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 2
-
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 1
- Co-authors
- Sumantra Ghoshal (4 shared papers)Sheetal Kandiah (1 shared paper)Koba A. Lomashvili (1 shared paper)Stephanie M. Pouch (1 shared paper)Christopher A. Bartlett (1 shared paper)Denise J. Lo (1 shared paper)Prem Kandiah (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Academy of Management Review (3 papers)Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports (1 paper)Harvard-Deusto business review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Peter Moran
6 papers receiving 680 citations
Peter Moran's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Strategy and Management 365
- Management Information Systems 180
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 191
- Accounting 144
- Business and International Management 21
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Moran
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Moran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Moran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Moran more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Moran
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Moran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Moran. The network helps show where Peter Moran may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Moran, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 588 |
| 2 | 1999 | 90 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | Un nuevo manifiesto a favor del "management" | 1999 | 1 |
| 7 | 2003 | 0 |
About Peter Moran
Peter Moran is a scholar working on Religious studies, Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 722 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (2 papers), Securities Regulation and Market Practices (1 paper), Organizational Management and Innovation (1 paper), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (1 paper), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (1 paper), Fungal Infections and Studies (1 paper), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1 paper) and Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (365 citations), Management Information Systems (180 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (191 citations), Accounting (144 citations) and Business and International Management (21 citations). Peter Moran has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sumantra Ghoshal, Sheetal Kandiah, Koba A. Lomashvili, Stephanie M. Pouch, Christopher A. Bartlett, Denise J. Lo and Prem Kandiah. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports and Harvard-Deusto business review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.