Laurie McAulay

916 total citations
36 papers, 676 citations indexed

About

Laurie McAulay is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Laurie McAulay has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 676 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Management Information Systems, 10 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 8 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Laurie McAulay's work include Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers). Laurie McAulay is often cited by papers focused on Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers). Laurie McAulay collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Laurie McAulay's co-authors include David Marginson, Melvin Roush, Tony van Zijl, Malcolm King, Neil F. Doherty, David Sims, Cyril Tomkins, John R. Doyle, William N. Evans and Paul Bottomley and has published in prestigious journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Omega.

In The Last Decade

Laurie McAulay

34 papers receiving 607 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Laurie McAulay United Kingdom	11	216	204	198	160	93	36	676
Peter Moran United States	4	144 0.7×	365 1.8×	180 0.9×	191 1.2×	112 1.2×	7	722
John A. Brierley United Kingdom	15	416 1.9×	193 0.9×	286 1.4×	132 0.8×	54 0.6×	51	872
P.M.G. Van Veen-Dirks Netherlands	13	243 1.1×	264 1.3×	436 2.2×	181 1.1×	77 0.8×	30	828
Olov Olson Sweden	13	232 1.1×	234 1.1×	665 3.4×	146 0.9×	132 1.4×	33	1.1k
Manzurul Alam Australia	17	238 1.1×	250 1.2×	376 1.9×	145 0.9×	74 0.8×	38	756
Raymond S. Schmidgall United States	18	241 1.1×	211 1.0×	207 1.0×	219 1.4×	102 1.1×	120	1.1k
Donald L. Lester United States	13	146 0.7×	352 1.7×	82 0.4×	168 1.1×	113 1.2×	27	750
Sal Kukalis United States	8	237 1.1×	249 1.2×	97 0.5×	145 0.9×	114 1.2×	13	611
Paul Andon Australia	15	241 1.1×	225 1.1×	307 1.6×	191 1.2×	76 0.8×	32	792
Terry L. Campbell United States	15	532 2.5×	231 1.1×	143 0.7×	137 0.9×	149 1.6×	29	842

Countries citing papers authored by Laurie McAulay

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie McAulay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie McAulay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie McAulay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie McAulay

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie McAulay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie McAulay. The network helps show where Laurie McAulay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurie McAulay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurie McAulay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurie McAulay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurie McAulay. Laurie McAulay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Zijl, Tony van, David Marginson, Laurie McAulay, & Melvin Roush. (2011). Examining a Positive Psychological Role for Performance Measures. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations

Marginson, David, Laurie McAulay, Melvin Roush, & Tony van Zijl. (2011). Examining a Positive Psychological Role for Performance Measures. SSRN Electronic Journal. 19 indexed citations

McAulay, Laurie. (2006). Unintended consequences of computer-mediated communications. Behaviour and Information Technology. 26(5). 385–398. 11 indexed citations

Hill, Malcolm, Laurie McAulay, & Adrian Wilkinson. (2006). Emissions trading and the management accountant. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 1 indexed citations

Doherty, Neil F. & Laurie McAulay. (2002). Towards the formulation of a comprehensive framework for the evaluation of investments in sell-side e-commerce. Evaluation and Program Planning. 25(2). 159–165. 9 indexed citations

McAulay, Laurie, et al.. (2002). The Stakeholder Dimension in Information Systems Evaluation. Journal of Information Technology. 17(4). 241–255. 44 indexed citations

McAulay, Laurie, et al.. (2001). Transferring priorities: a three-act play on transfer pricing. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 12(1). 87–113. 5 indexed citations

McAulay, Laurie. (2000). Of clouds and clocks : an approach to information technology evaluation and personal freedom. Southern African Business Review. 4(2). 7–13. 1 indexed citations

Marginson, David, Malcolm King, & Laurie McAulay. (2000). Executives’ use of Information Technology: Comparison of Electronic Mail and an Accounting Information System. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 15(2). 149–164. 6 indexed citations

10.

Marginson, David, Malcolm King, & Laurie McAulay. (2000). Executives' use of information technology: comparison of electronic mail and an accounting information system. Journal of Information Technology. 15(2). 149–164. 13 indexed citations

11.

McAulay, Laurie, Malcolm King, & C. Carr. (1998). EXPERTISE AND LEARNING: AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE THEORY–PRACTICE DEBATE. The British Accounting Review. 30(2). 173–200. 5 indexed citations

12.

McAulay, Laurie, et al.. (1997). The Expertise of Finance and Accountancy: an Interdisciplinary Study. British Journal of Management. 8(1). 75–83. 2 indexed citations

13.

Pitt, Martyn, et al.. (1997). Horse Races, Governance and the Chance to Fight: On the Formation of Organizational Agendas. British Journal of Management. 8(s1). 19–30. 5 indexed citations

14.

Doyle, John R., et al.. (1996). The judge, the model of the judge, and the model of the judged as judge: Analyses of the UK 1992 research assessment exercise data for business and management studies. Omega. 24(1). 13–28. 35 indexed citations

15.

Doyle, John R., et al.. (1996). Citation as effortful voting: A reply to ones, Brinn and Pendlebury. Omega. 24(5). 603–606. 19 indexed citations

16.

Sims, David & Laurie McAulay. (1995). Management Learning as a Learning Process: An Invitation. Management Learning. 26(1). 5–20. 15 indexed citations

17.

McAulay, Laurie & David Sims. (1995). An Inquiry into Management Learning. Management Learning. 26(1). 21–36. 1 indexed citations

18.

McAulay, Laurie. (1995). Too Narrow a View? A Response to Grey and Mitev. Management Learning. 26(1). 97–99. 1 indexed citations

19.

McAulay, Laurie, et al.. (1993). Financial analysis and expert systems. Journal of Information Technology. 8(3). 184–194. 3 indexed citations

20.

King, Malcolm & Laurie McAulay. (1989). Information technology and the accountant: a case study. Behaviour and Information Technology. 8(2). 109–123. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact