Peggy O’Neill

20 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Peggy O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Education 181
  • Literature and Literary Theory 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
  • Language and Linguistics 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 31
Replace Poldi Kuhl with:
Poldi Kuhl Germany
David Hirsh United Kingdom
Cathy Coulter United States
Emory H. Woodard United States
Bridie Raban Australia
Negah Allahyar Malaysia
Sharon Nelson‐Barber United States
Akbar Azizifar Iran
Katherine T. Bucher United States
Adriana Cristina Boulhoça Suehiro Brazil
Peggy O’Neill relative to Poldi Kuhl Germany Poldi Kuhl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Poldi Kuhl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peggy O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peggy O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peggy O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peggy O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peggy O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peggy O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peggy O’Neill. The network helps show where Peggy O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peggy O’Neill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peggy O’Neill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peggy O’Neill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peggy O’Neill. Peggy O’Neill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Upacking Assumptions, Providing Context: A Response to Marc Bousquet
0
2 17
3
What We Are Becoming: Developments in Undergraduate Writing Majors
2
4
Reframing Reliability for Writing Assessment
7
5 27
6 11
7 10
8
Assessing Writing: A Critical Sourcebook
17
9
What Teachers Say About Different Kinds of Mandated State Writing Tests
3
10
Moving Beyond Holistic Scoring through Validity Inquiry
11
11 70
12
A Field of Dreams: Independent Writing Programs and the Future of Composition Studies
10
13 24
14 0
15
Listening to Students: Contextualizing Response to Student Writing.
8
16 28
17 1
18 11
19 10
20 3

About Peggy O’Neill

Peggy O’Neill is a scholar working on Education, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Language and Linguistics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Student Assessment and Feedback (9 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (6 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (84 citations) and Education (181 citations). Peggy O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jodi Teitelman, Brian Huot, Linda Adler-Kassner, Carol Severino, Bruce McComiskey, Patrick Sullivan, Kristine Hansen, Michael P. Williamson, Sandra Murphy and Margaret J. McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as College Composition and Communication, Assessing Writing and Journal of Gerontological Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026