Pedro Oliveira

44 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quad...2009202620142020200950010001.5k2.0k

Peers

Pedro Oliveira
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.5k
  • Sociology and Political Science 916
  • Strategy and Management 753
  • Social Psychology 606
  • Marketing 478
Replace Nicholas J. Ashill with:
Nicholas J. Ashill United Arab Emirates
Gerardo A. Okhuysen United States
Ella Miron‐Spektor Israel
Dusya Vera United States
Guclu Atinc United States
James M. Bloodgood United States
Corey Phelps United States
Gerard P. Hodgkinson United Kingdom
Sven C. Voelpel Germany
Stacy E. McManus United States
Pedro Oliveira relative to Nicholas J. Ashill United Arab Emirates Nicholas J. Ashill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nicholas J. Ashill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pedro Oliveira

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Oliveira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Oliveira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Oliveira more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro Oliveira

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Oliveira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Oliveira. The network helps show where Pedro Oliveira may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pedro Oliveira

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pedro Oliveira. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pedro Oliveira based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pedro Oliveira. Pedro Oliveira is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 8
3 0
4 11
5 2
6 1
7 1
8 1
9
When Patients Become Innovators
1
10 7
11
Looking into nostalgia and the Boca Doce brand in online communications: a netnographic exploration of a Portuguese instant dessert.
1
12 10
13 63
14 129
15 87
16 167
17 1
18 31
19 50
20 79

About Pedro Oliveira

Pedro Oliveira is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Computer Science Applications and Marketing, having authored 48 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Service and Product Innovation (9 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (7 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.5k citations), Business and International Management (234 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (407 citations). Pedro Oliveira has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aleda V. Roth, Enno Siemsen, Eric von Hippel, Francisco Veloso, Miguel Piña e Cunha, Arménio Rego, Leid Zejnilović, Ruth Stock, Wendell Gilland and Eric A. von Hippel. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Technological Forecasting and Social Change and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026