Paul M. Thomas

434 total citations
21 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Paul M. Thomas is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul M. Thomas has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Paul M. Thomas's work include Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (11 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (10 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers). Paul M. Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (11 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (10 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers). Paul M. Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Italy. Paul M. Thomas's co-authors include Jeffrey A. Steidle, Michael L. Fanto, Stefan F. Preble, Mohammad Soltani, Hyowon Moon, Tsung‐Ju Lu, Wei Kong, S.L. Rommel, Dirk Englund and Hyeongrak Choi and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Optics Letters and Optics Express.

In The Last Decade

Paul M. Thomas

18 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul M. Thomas United States 9 262 202 64 51 37 21 309
Masahiro Kakuda Japan 9 275 1.0× 266 1.3× 61 1.0× 105 2.1× 36 1.0× 24 356
S. Varoutsis France 8 282 1.1× 363 1.8× 74 1.2× 109 2.1× 70 1.9× 10 400
Xiangjun Shang China 12 246 0.9× 277 1.4× 99 1.5× 74 1.5× 131 3.5× 49 366
Edmund Harbord United Kingdom 11 212 0.8× 257 1.3× 55 0.9× 58 1.1× 58 1.6× 29 293
Kazuhiro Igeta Japan 5 199 0.8× 320 1.6× 91 1.4× 42 0.8× 32 0.9× 9 364
B. M. Holmes United Kingdom 12 348 1.3× 235 1.2× 38 0.6× 47 0.9× 15 0.4× 39 395
Sascha Kolatschek Germany 11 206 0.8× 194 1.0× 57 0.9× 95 1.9× 30 0.8× 12 290
M. Ashkan Seyedi United States 11 386 1.5× 164 0.8× 192 3.0× 50 1.0× 72 1.9× 29 461
Bratati Mukhopadhyay India 14 489 1.9× 259 1.3× 149 2.3× 38 0.7× 45 1.2× 52 508
Lada Vukušić Austria 10 260 1.0× 392 1.9× 58 0.9× 59 1.2× 73 2.0× 19 453

Countries citing papers authored by Paul M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul M. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul M. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul M. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul M. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul M. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul M. Thomas. The network helps show where Paul M. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul M. Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul M. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul M. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul M. Thomas. Paul M. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomas, Paul M., Michael L. Fanto, Jeffrey A. Steidle, et al.. (2019). Ion milled facet for direct coupling to optical waveguides. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 114–114. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fanto, Michael L., Tsung‐Ju Lu, Hyeongrak Choi, et al.. (2018). Wide-Bandgap Integrated Photonic Circuits for Nonlinear Interactions and Interfacing with Quantum Memories. 257–258. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lu, Tsung‐Ju, Michael L. Fanto, Hyeongrak Choi, et al.. (2018). Aluminum nitride integrated photonics platform for the ultraviolet to visible spectrum. Optics Express. 26(9). 11147–11147. 118 indexed citations
5.
Lu, Tsung‐Ju, Michael L. Fanto, Hyeongrak Choi, et al.. (2018). An Aluminum Nitride Integrated Photonics Platform for the Ultraviolet to Visible Spectrum. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. SF3A.4–SF3A.4. 6 indexed citations
6.
Steidle, Jeffrey A., et al.. (2017). Silicon photonic wafer fabrication for education. 184–188. 1 indexed citations
7.
Vernon, Z., M. Menotti, Jeffrey A. Steidle, et al.. (2017). Truly unentangled photon pairs without spectral filtering. Optics Letters. 42(18). 3638–3638. 68 indexed citations
8.
Alsing, Paul M., Dirk Englund, Paul M. Thomas, et al.. (2017). Integrated photon sources for quantum information science applications. 9500. 18–18.
9.
Steidle, Jeffrey A., et al.. (2017). Silicon Photonic wafer fabrication for education. 1 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Zihao, Michael L. Fanto, Jeffrey A. Steidle, et al.. (2017). Passively mode-locked InAs quantum dot lasers on a silicon substrate by Pd-GaAs wafer bonding. Applied Physics Letters. 110(14). 9 indexed citations
11.
Gaur, Abhinav, et al.. (2015). Surface treatments to reduce leakage current in In0.53Ga0.47As p-i-n diodes. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena. 33(2). 2 indexed citations
12.
Manuel, Pascal, Juan Salvador Rojas-Ramírez, Ravi Droopad, et al.. (2015). Integration of broken-gap heterojunction InAs/GaSb Esaki tunnel diodes on silicon. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena. 33(6). 13 indexed citations
13.
Thomas, Paul M., Abhinav Gaur, Brian Romanczyk, et al.. (2015). Performance Evaluation of In0.53Ga0.47As Esaki Tunnel Diodes on Silicon and InP Substrates. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 62(8). 2450–2456. 9 indexed citations
14.
Romanczyk, Brian, Paul M. Thomas, S.L. Rommel, et al.. (2013). Benchmarking current density in staggered gap In0.53Ga0.47As/GaAs0.5Sb0.5 heterojunction Esaki tunnel diodes. Applied Physics Letters. 102(21). 19 indexed citations
15.
Romanczyk, Brian, Paul M. Thomas, S.L. Rommel, et al.. (2012). Benchmarking and improving III-V Esaki diode performance with a record 2.2 MA/cm<sup>2</sup> peak current density to enhance TFET drive current. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). 27.1.1–27.1.3. 26 indexed citations
16.
Barth, Michael, Paul M. Thomas, Santosh Kurinec, et al.. (2010). Sub-micron InGaAs Esaki diodes with record high peak current density. 27. 163–164. 7 indexed citations
17.
Romanczyk, Brian, Eugene Freeman, Paul M. Thomas, et al.. (2009). Sub-micron Esaki Tunnel Diode fabrication and characterization. 1–2. 2 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, Paul M., Michael Barth, Kelsey E. Johnson, et al.. (2009). Indium gallium arsenide on silicon interband tunnel diodes for NDR-based memory and steep subthreshold slope transistor applications. 19. 69–70. 1 indexed citations
19.
Thomas, Paul M., Brian Romanczyk, Eugene Freeman, et al.. (2009). Fabrication technique for arrays of Germanium-on-Nothing nanowires. 1–2.
20.
Rommel, S.L., Paul M. Thomas, Michael Barth, et al.. (2008). Record PVCR GaAs-based tunnel diodes fabricated on Si substrates using aspect ratio trapping. 5. 1–4. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026