Condensed Matter Physics

742.9k papers and 17.8M indexed citations i.

About

742.9k papers covering Condensed Matter Physics have received a total of 17.8M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism, Theoretical and Computational Physics and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics and also cover the fields of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Some of the most active scholars covering Condensed Matter Physics are Georg Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Philip W. Anderson, David Vanderbilt, Michael E. Fisher, F. D. M. Haldane, Kurt Binder, Scott Kirkpatrick, John P. Perdew and P. W. Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Condensed Matter Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Condensed Matter Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Condensed Matter Physics.

Countries where authors publish papers about Condensed Matter Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Condensed Matter Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Condensed Matter Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Condensed Matter Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025