Nina D. Cole

746 total citations
20 papers, 503 citations indexed

About

Nina D. Cole is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Nina D. Cole has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 503 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Nina D. Cole's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers). Nina D. Cole is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers). Nina D. Cole collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Taiwan and Cambodia. Nina D. Cole's co-authors include Gary P. Latham, Yvonne McNulty, Gonzague Jourdain, Denis Chênevert, I‐Min Tso, Patrick F. Bruning, Chanrith Ngin and Hsin‐Chen Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Animal Behaviour and Academy of Management Perspectives.

In The Last Decade

Nina D. Cole

20 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nina D. Cole Canada 12 264 162 158 135 81 20 503
Meina Liu United States 12 122 0.5× 333 2.1× 92 0.6× 142 1.1× 180 2.2× 27 549
Betsy Wackernagel Bach United States 9 136 0.5× 173 1.1× 80 0.5× 59 0.4× 178 2.2× 17 448
Bernd Six Germany 9 162 0.6× 200 1.2× 31 0.2× 95 0.7× 125 1.5× 14 436
Andrea Griffin United States 6 152 0.6× 140 0.9× 40 0.3× 140 1.0× 118 1.5× 13 403
Hubert Touzard France 5 93 0.4× 312 1.9× 103 0.7× 18 0.1× 397 4.9× 13 636
Caryn E. Medved United States 12 144 0.5× 308 1.9× 38 0.2× 193 1.4× 114 1.4× 21 515
Seval Gündemir Netherlands 9 120 0.5× 259 1.6× 48 0.3× 208 1.5× 155 1.9× 19 492
Johny T. Garner United States 11 203 0.8× 362 2.2× 139 0.9× 34 0.3× 305 3.8× 36 653
C. W. Von Bergen United States 11 85 0.3× 116 0.7× 26 0.2× 99 0.7× 72 0.9× 37 373
Chad I. Peddie United States 6 143 0.5× 287 1.8× 24 0.2× 284 2.1× 137 1.7× 8 527

Countries citing papers authored by Nina D. Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina D. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina D. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina D. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina D. Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina D. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina D. Cole. The network helps show where Nina D. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina D. Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina D. Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina D. Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina D. Cole. Nina D. Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lin, Hsin‐Chen, et al.. (2017). Exploring justice judgment patterns in Asia: a four country multi-group latent class analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 30(2). 306–336. 3 indexed citations
2.
Cole, Nina D., et al.. (2014). Why Do International Assignments Fail?. International Studies of Management and Organization. 44(3). 66–79. 34 indexed citations
3.
Chênevert, Denis, et al.. (2013). The role of organisational justice, burnout and commitment in the understanding of absenteeism in the Canadian healthcare sector. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 27(3). 350–367. 39 indexed citations
4.
Cole, Nina D., et al.. (2012). Scramble competition for moulting females as a driving force for extreme male dwarfism in spiders. Animal Behaviour. 84(4). 937–945. 29 indexed citations
5.
Cole, Nina D.. (2012). Expatriate accompanying partners: the males speak. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 50(3). 308–326. 32 indexed citations
6.
Cole, Nina D.. (2011). Managing global talent: solving the spousal adjustment problem. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 22(7). 1504–1530. 62 indexed citations
7.
Cole, Nina D. & Yvonne McNulty. (2011). Why do female expatriates “fit‐in” better than males?. Cross Cultural Management An International Journal. 18(2). 144–164. 61 indexed citations
8.
Cole, Nina D.. (2009). Workplace Romance: A Justice Analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology. 24(4). 363–372. 37 indexed citations
9.
Cole, Nina D.. (2008). How long should a training program be? A field study of “rules‐of‐thumb”. Journal of Workplace Learning. 20(1). 54–70. 13 indexed citations
10.
Cole, Nina D.. (2008). The effects of differences in explanations, employee attributions, type of infraction, and discipline severity on perceived fairness of employee discipline. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration. 25(2). 107–120. 8 indexed citations
11.
Cole, Nina D.. (2007). Consistency in employee discipline: an empirical exploration. Personnel Review. 37(1). 109–117. 13 indexed citations
12.
Cole, Nina D., et al.. (2006). Due Process Model of Procedural Justice in Performance Appraisal: Promotion versus Termination Scenarios. Psychological Reports. 99(3). 819–832. 2 indexed citations
13.
Cole, Nina D., et al.. (2005). Opportunity Knocks: Perceptions of Fairness in Employee Benefits. Compensation & Benefits Review. 37(2). 55–62. 11 indexed citations
14.
Cole, Nina D.. (2004). Gender Differences in Perceived Disciplinary Fairness. Gender Work and Organization. 11(3). 254–279. 27 indexed citations
15.
Cole, Nina D., et al.. (2004). Perceptions of distributive and procedural justice in employee benefits: flexible versus traditional benefit plans. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 19(1). 19–40. 33 indexed citations
16.
Cole, Nina D., et al.. (2003). Decision Frame and Procedural Justice: Interactive Effects on Perceptions of Distributive Justice. Psychological Reports. 93(2). 631–637. 1 indexed citations
17.
Cole, Nina D., et al.. (2002). The High Touch Classroom: Small Group Learning in Large Class Contexts. (the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning). Academic exchange quarterly. 6(1). 11. 2 indexed citations
18.
Cole, Nina D. & Gary P. Latham. (1997). Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82(5). 699–705. 86 indexed citations
19.
Cole, Nina D. & Gary P. Latham. (1997). Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82(5). 699–705. 5 indexed citations
20.
Cole, Nina D.. (1995). How employee empowerment improves manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Perspectives. 9(1). 80–80. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Meina Liu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Betsy Wackernagel Bach Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bernd Six Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Griffin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hubert Touzard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Caryn E. Medved Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Seval Gündemir Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Johny T. Garner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. W. Von Bergen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chad I. Peddie
Rankless by CCL
2026