Hsin‐Chen Lin

696 total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 504 citations indexed

About

Hsin‐Chen Lin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Hsin‐Chen Lin has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 504 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Marketing and 4 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Hsin‐Chen Lin's work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). Hsin‐Chen Lin is often cited by papers focused on Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). Hsin‐Chen Lin collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Russia and Spain. Hsin‐Chen Lin's co-authors include Patrick F. Bruning, Manohar U. Kalwani, Bradley J. Alge, Nina D. Cole, Nick Turner, Josep Rialp Criado, Chanrith Ngin, Joan Freixanet and Jiawei Shao and has published in prestigious journals such as Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, European Journal of Marketing and Journal of Advertising.

In The Last Decade

Hsin‐Chen Lin

15 papers receiving 476 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services

2018 257 citations Hsin‐Chen Lin, Patrick F. Bruning et al. Business Horizons profile →

Peers

Hsin‐Chen Lin

SPS

MARKE

ISM

COMMU

OBHRM

Hamida Skandrani Tunisia

Jason Ho Canada

Andrew Lipsman Israel

Fine F. Leung Hong Kong

Catherine Frethey‐Bentham New Zealand

Sara Kamal United States

Melanie Dempsey Canada

Ebru Uzunoğlu Türkiye

Joanna Phillips Melancon United States

Todd J. Bacile United States

Hamida Skandrani Tunisia

Hsin‐Chen Lin

346 ×0.9

SPS

214 ×1.0

MARKE

116 ×1.2

ISM

47 ×0.6

COMMU

80 ×1.1

OBHRM

Citations per year, relative to Hsin‐Chen Lin Hsin‐Chen Lin (= 1×) peers Hamida Skandrani

Countries citing papers authored by Hsin‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hsin‐Chen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hsin‐Chen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hsin‐Chen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hsin‐Chen Lin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hsin‐Chen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hsin‐Chen Lin. The network helps show where Hsin‐Chen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hsin‐Chen Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hsin‐Chen Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hsin‐Chen Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hsin‐Chen Lin. Hsin‐Chen Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Lin, Hsin‐Chen, et al.. (2025). Quality and Intention Signaling: A Meta-Analysis of How Sponsorship Relates to Consumer Responses According to Content, Observability, Credibility, and National Culture. Journal of Advertising. 1–20.

Lin, Hsin‐Chen & Patrick F. Bruning. (2023). Guidelines for sponsorship signaling within socially complex markets. Business Horizons. 67(1). 19–30. 3 indexed citations

Freixanet, Joan, et al.. (2021). Riding the storm out: the short- and long-term effects of export promotion on firm performance during an economic downturn. European J of International Management. 16(1). 118–118. 2 indexed citations

Bruning, Patrick F., et al.. (2021). Crafting solutions to leadership demands for well-being and effectiveness. Business Horizons. 65(5). 603–615. 4 indexed citations

Lin, Hsin‐Chen & Patrick F. Bruning. (2020). Sponsorship in focus: a typology of sponsorship contexts and research agenda. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 39(2). 213–233. 21 indexed citations

Bruning, Patrick F., Bradley J. Alge, & Hsin‐Chen Lin. (2020). Social networks and social media: Understanding and managing influence vulnerability in a connected society. Business Horizons. 63(6). 749–761. 22 indexed citations

Bruning, Patrick F., Nick Turner, & Hsin‐Chen Lin. (2020). Transformational leadership, group affective tone, and group member social inferences: A leadership complementarity perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration. 37(4). 383–395. 3 indexed citations

Lin, Hsin‐Chen & Patrick F. Bruning. (2020). Comparing consumers’ in-group-favor and out-group-animosity processes within sports sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing. 54(4). 791–824. 14 indexed citations

Bruning, Patrick F., Bradley J. Alge, & Hsin‐Chen Lin. (2018). The embedding forces of network commitment: An examination of the psychological processes linking advice centrality and susceptibility to social influence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 148. 54–69. 21 indexed citations

10.

Freixanet, Joan, et al.. (2018). Riding the storm out: the short- and long-term effects of export promotion on firm performance during an economic downturn. European J of International Management. 1(1). 1–1. 1 indexed citations

11.

Lin, Hsin‐Chen, et al.. (2018). Using online opinion leaders to promote the hedonic and utilitarian value of products and services. Business Horizons. 61(3). 431–442. 257 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Lin, Hsin‐Chen & Manohar U. Kalwani. (2017). Culturally Contingent Electronic Word-of-Mouth Signaling and Screening: A Comparative Study of Product Reviews in the United States and Japan. Journal of International Marketing. 26(2). 80–102. 52 indexed citations

13.

Lin, Hsin‐Chen, et al.. (2017). An exploration of parental preferences for child care services in Canada. Services Marketing Quarterly. 39(1). 49–63. 6 indexed citations

14.

Lin, Hsin‐Chen. (2017). How Political Candidates' Use of Facebook Relates to the Election Outcomes. International Journal of Market Research. 59(1). 77–96. 32 indexed citations

15.

Lin, Hsin‐Chen, et al.. (2017). Exploring justice judgment patterns in Asia: a four country multi-group latent class analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 30(2). 306–336. 3 indexed citations

16.

Lin, Hsin‐Chen, et al.. (2017). Taking a global view on brand post popularity: Six social media brand post practices for global markets. Business Horizons. 60(5). 621–633. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact