Nigel V. Marsh

59 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Nigel V. Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Epidemiology 778
  • Social Psychology 225
  • Rehabilitation 62
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 171
  • Pharmacy 25
Replace James Tonks with:
James Tonks United Kingdom
Thomas J. Guilmette United States
Duncan R. Babbage New Zealand
Michael Yochelson United States
Catherine Bungener France
Michael Oddy United Kingdom
Jason R. Soble United States
Walter J. Wittich Canada
Patrick S. Bordnick United States
Jeffrey D. Gfeller United States
Nigel V. Marsh relative to James Tonks United Kingdom James Tonks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.8×
James Tonks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel V. Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel V. Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel V. Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel V. Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel V. Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel V. Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel V. Marsh. The network helps show where Nigel V. Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nigel V. Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nigel V. Marsh Line = papers co-authored together Nigel V. Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001212
2 1998209
3 1998209
4 2002169
5 1998154
6 2002123
7 1988113
8
2001106
9 200182
10 199363
11 201955
12 199949
13 200647
14 199142
15 199635
16 200031
17 198930
18 199130
19 199530
20 202327

About Nigel V. Marsh

Nigel V. Marsh is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Rehabilitation, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (17 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (1 paper) and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (778 citations), Social Psychology (225 citations), Rehabilitation (62 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (171 citations) and Pharmacy (25 citations). Nigel V. Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Singapore and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Denyse A. Kersel, Jack H. Havill, James Wallace Sleigh, JAMIE W. SLEIGH, Robert G. Knight, Michael P. O’Driscoll, Hamish P. D. Godfrey, Celestino Rodríguez, Trinidad García and Débora Areces. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychology, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, Critical Care and Resuscitation and Neuropsychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact