Robert G. Knight

103 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Robert G. Knight
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 861
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 642
  • Applied Psychology 229
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 691
  • Clinical Psychology 696
Replace Kenneth M. Adams with:
Kenneth M. Adams United States
Linas A. Bieliauskas United States
Cynthia L. Arfken United States
Thomas Ten Have United States
Joseph J. Ryan United States
Jerry J. Sweet United States
Bradley N. Axelrod United States
Jin‐Sang Yoon South Korea
John T. Chibnall United States
Keith G. Wilson Canada
Robert G. Knight relative to Kenneth M. Adams United States Kenneth M. Adams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kenneth M. Adams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Knight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Knight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Knight. The network helps show where Robert G. Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Knight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Knight Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Knight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997316
2 2006298
3 1993144
4 1998119
5 1997113
6 1988110
7 1992103
8 198998
9 199089
10 200473
11 201157
12 201257
13 200254
14 200654
15 198852
16 200952
17 199651
18 199849
19 201248
20 197845

About Robert G. Knight

Robert G. Knight is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 105 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (20 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (9 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (8 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (861 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (642 citations), Applied Psychology (229 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (691 citations) and Clinical Psychology (696 citations). Robert G. Knight has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hamish P. D. Godfrey, Nickolai Titov, Fiona M. Partridge, Rob McGee, Nigel V. Marsh, Sheila Williams, Ross McD. Young, Samir N. Bishara, C. Murray Skeaff and Jennifer McMahon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Neuropsychology, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact