Neuropsychology

3.1k papers and 133.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Neuropsychology in the last decades have received a total of 133.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuropsychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (932 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (433 papers) specifically the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (484 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (393 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (357 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuropsychology are R. Walter Heinrichs, Konstantine K. Zakzanis, Timothy A. Salthouse, Naftali Raz, Jaime Kulisevsky, Berta Pascual‐Sedano, Javier Pagonabarraga, Alexandre Gironell, Gisela Llebaria and Carmen García‐Sánchez.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuropsychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuropsychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuropsychology.

Countries where authors publish in Neuropsychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuropsychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuropsychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuropsychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025