Thomas J. Guilmette

2.8k total citations
49 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Thomas J. Guilmette is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas J. Guilmette has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Epidemiology, 11 papers in Clinical Psychology and 10 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas J. Guilmette's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Thomas J. Guilmette is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers). Thomas J. Guilmette collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Israel. Thomas J. Guilmette's co-authors include Kathleen Hart, David Faust, Hal R. Arkes, Anthony J. Giuliano, Jerry J. Sweet, E. Mark Mahone, Kirk J. Stucky, Michael Westerveld, Brenda J. Spiegler and Nancy Hebben and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Thomas J. Guilmette

46 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas J. Guilmette United States 20 968 449 384 316 289 49 2.0k
Mauricio A. García-Barrera Canada 19 426 0.4× 532 1.2× 438 1.1× 393 1.2× 259 0.9× 69 1.9k
Ken McFarland Australia 25 624 0.6× 581 1.3× 440 1.1× 225 0.7× 285 1.0× 55 1.8k
Hans Bergman Sweden 25 803 0.8× 341 0.8× 465 1.2× 365 1.2× 194 0.7× 82 2.6k
Arthur MacNeill Horton United States 20 440 0.5× 671 1.5× 514 1.3× 244 0.8× 171 0.6× 118 1.7k
Andrew S. Davis United States 18 271 0.3× 737 1.6× 644 1.7× 422 1.3× 181 0.6× 73 2.4k
David B. Coppel United States 17 538 0.6× 60 0.1× 247 0.6× 125 0.4× 102 0.4× 36 1.7k
Leonard Diller United States 29 904 0.9× 1.3k 2.9× 648 1.7× 188 0.6× 475 1.6× 106 3.2k
James A. Holdnack United States 29 325 0.3× 727 1.6× 965 2.5× 561 1.8× 145 0.5× 63 2.1k
Eric A. Zillmer United States 16 402 0.4× 263 0.6× 243 0.6× 179 0.6× 167 0.6× 53 1.2k
Roger L. Greene United States 24 506 0.5× 223 0.5× 514 1.3× 332 1.1× 58 0.2× 96 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Guilmette

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Guilmette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Guilmette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Guilmette more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Guilmette

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Guilmette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Guilmette. The network helps show where Thomas J. Guilmette may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Guilmette

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Guilmette. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Guilmette based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Guilmette. Thomas J. Guilmette is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Drogin, Eric Y., et al.. (2016). Assessing Adaptive Functioning in Death Penalty Cases after Hall and DSM-5.. PubMed. 44(1). 96–105. 1 indexed citations
2.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (2015). DSM-5: Challenging diagnostic testimony. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 42-43. 128–134. 5 indexed citations
3.
Bishop, Duane S., Ivan W. Miller, Thomas J. Guilmette, et al.. (2014). Family Intervention: Telephone Tracking (FITT): A Pilot Stroke Outcome Study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 21(sup1). S63–S74. 46 indexed citations
4.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (2008). Assigning Qualitative Descriptions to Test Scores in Neuropsychology: Forensic Implications. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 22(1). 122–139. 15 indexed citations
5.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (2007). Concussion understanding and management among New England high school football coaches. Brain Injury. 21(10). 1039–1047. 77 indexed citations
6.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (2001). Promoting Smoking Cessation in the Rehabilitation Setting. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 80(8). 560–562. 15 indexed citations
7.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (2001). The Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking in an Acute Inpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Population. Substance Abuse. 22(3). 187–192. 4 indexed citations
9.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (1997). The authors reply. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 78(4). 451–451. 2 indexed citations
10.
Guilmette, Thomas J.. (1997). Pocket guide to brain injury, cognitive, and neurobehavioral rehabilitation. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations
11.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (1996). Order Effects in the Administration of a Forced-Choice Procedure for Detection of Malingering in Disability Claimants' Evaluations. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 83(3). 1007–1016. 22 indexed citations
12.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (1994). Detecting simulated memory impairment: Comparison of the rey fifteen-item test and the hiscock forced-choice procedure. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 8(3). 283–294. 86 indexed citations
13.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (1994). Validity of Neuropsychological Test Results in Disability Evaluations. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 78(3_suppl). 1179–1186. 21 indexed citations
14.
Guilmette, Thomas J., Kathleen Hart, & Anthony J. Giuliano. (1993). Malingering detection: The use of a forced-choice method in identifying organic versus simulated memory impairment. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 7(1). 59–69. 73 indexed citations
15.
Guilmette, Thomas J. & David Faust. (1991). Characteristics of neuropsychologists who prefer the Halstead-Reitan or the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 22(1). 80–83. 1 indexed citations
16.
Guilmette, Thomas J. & Anthony J. Giuliano. (1991). Taking the stand: Issues and strategies in forensic neuropsychology. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 5(3). 197–219. 14 indexed citations
17.
Arkes, Hal R., David Faust, & Thomas J. Guilmette. (1990). Response to Schmidt's (1988) comments on Faust, Hart, Guilmette, and Arkes (1988).. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 21(1). 3–4. 4 indexed citations
18.
Guilmette, Thomas J., et al.. (1990). A national survey of psychologists who offer neuropsychological services. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 5(4). 373–392. 38 indexed citations
19.
Faust, David & Thomas J. Guilmette. (1990). To say it's not so doesn't prove that it isn't: Research on the detection of malingering: Reply to Bigler.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 58(2). 248–250. 18 indexed citations
20.
Arkes, Hal R., David Faust, Thomas J. Guilmette, & Kathleen Hart. (1988). Eliminating the hindsight bias.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73(2). 305–307. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026