Neuropsychology Review

799 papers and 49.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 799 papers published in Neuropsychology Review in the last decades have received a total of 49.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Neuropsychology Review usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (391 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (249 papers) and Epidemiology (137 papers) specifically the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (110 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (106 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neuropsychology Review are Terry L. Jernigan, Eugene K. Emory, Mónica Rosselli, Joan Stiles, María Beatriz Jurado, Xavier Delbeuck, Russell A. Barkley, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Kate Crowley and Patricia A. Reuter‐Lorenz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neuropsychology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neuropsychology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neuropsychology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Neuropsychology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neuropsychology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neuropsychology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neuropsychology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025