Critical Care and Resuscitation

1.1k papers and 11.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Critical Care and Resuscitation in the last decades have received a total of 11.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Care and Resuscitation usually cover Epidemiology (287 papers), Emergency Medicine (266 papers) and Surgery (261 papers) specifically the topics of Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (229 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (151 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Care and Resuscitation are Rinaldo Bellomo, L.I.G. Worthley, Michael Bailey, John Myburgh, Graeme Duke, David Pilcher, Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Simon Finfer, Glenn M. Eastwood and Marianne J. Chapman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Care and Resuscitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Care and Resuscitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Care and Resuscitation.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Care and Resuscitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Care and Resuscitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Care and Resuscitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Care and Resuscitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025