Neil Howe

5.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
13 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Neil Howe is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil Howe has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cultural Studies, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Neil Howe's work include Education, Sociology, Communication Studies (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (1 paper) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper). Neil Howe is often cited by papers focused on Education, Sociology, Communication Studies (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (1 paper) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper). Neil Howe collaborates with scholars based in United States. Neil Howe's co-authors include William M. Strauss, Ian Williams, Richard Jackson, Richard F. W. Jackson, William Strauss and Peter G. Peterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Harvard business review, Current History and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

Neil Howe

12 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation 1991 2026 2002 2014 2000 1991 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Neil Howe United States 8 1.1k 691 391 364 280 13 3.2k
Tara Fenwick Canada 42 1.2k 1.1× 2.5k 3.6× 956 2.4× 318 0.9× 300 1.1× 157 5.5k
Stephen W.Littlejohn United States 13 1.1k 1.0× 529 0.8× 123 0.3× 306 0.8× 172 0.6× 25 2.5k
Thomas R. Lindlof United States 12 1.6k 1.5× 524 0.8× 323 0.8× 592 1.6× 118 0.4× 19 4.0k
Michaël Meyer Austria 26 2.2k 1.9× 612 0.9× 560 1.4× 218 0.6× 83 0.3× 112 5.1k
Stephanie O’Donohoe United Kingdom 27 1.9k 1.7× 238 0.3× 361 0.9× 248 0.7× 115 0.4× 73 3.4k
Richard Edwards United Kingdom 27 1.6k 1.4× 1.8k 2.7× 544 1.4× 199 0.5× 170 0.6× 73 4.6k
Michael Minkov Bulgaria 25 1.8k 1.6× 432 0.6× 902 2.3× 1.7k 4.6× 215 0.8× 62 5.3k
W. James Potter United States 31 1.6k 1.4× 820 1.2× 114 0.3× 672 1.8× 248 0.9× 68 4.2k
Déborah Cohen United States 13 882 0.8× 1.3k 1.9× 120 0.3× 446 1.2× 183 0.7× 36 3.7k
Simeon Yates United Kingdom 14 1.2k 1.1× 591 0.9× 150 0.4× 280 0.8× 106 0.4× 50 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Howe. The network helps show where Neil Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Howe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Howe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Howe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Howe. Neil Howe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Peterson, Peter G. & Neil Howe. (2017). On Borrowed Time.
2.
Howe, Neil. (2014). How the millennial generation is transforming employee benefits.. PubMed. 30(2). 8–14. 6 indexed citations
3.
Howe, Neil & Richard F. W. Jackson. (2011). Global Aging and the Crisis of the 2020s. Current History. 110(732). 20–25. 7 indexed citations
4.
Howe, Neil. (2010). A New Parent Generation: Meet Mr. and Mrs. Gen X.. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review. 75(9). 4–10. 1 indexed citations
5.
Howe, Neil. (2010). Meet Mr. and Mrs. Gen X: A New Parent Generation.. The School Administrator. 67(1). 18–23. 1 indexed citations
6.
Howe, Neil & William Strauss. (2007). Los próximos 20 años: cómo evolucionarán las actitudes de los clientes y de la fuerza de trabajo. Harvard business review. 85(7). 40–54. 2 indexed citations
7.
Howe, Neil, et al.. (2007). The next 20 years: how customer and workforce attitudes will evolve.. PubMed. 85(7-8). 41–52, 191. 246 indexed citations
8.
Howe, Neil, et al.. (2007). The aging of Korea Demographics and retirement policy in the Land of the Morning Calm. 29 indexed citations
9.
Howe, Neil. (2005). Harnessing the Power of Millennials: New Education Strategies for a Confident, Achieving Youth Generation.. The School Administrator. 62(8). 18. 10 indexed citations
10.
Howe, Neil & Richard Jackson. (2004). Projecting Immigration: A Survey of the Current State of Practice and Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations
11.
Howe, Neil, et al.. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1443 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Howe, Neil, et al.. (1993). 13th Gen: Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail?. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 77 indexed citations
13.
Strauss, William M. & Neil Howe. (1991). Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1331 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026