Nathan F. Gardner

32 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

Auger recombination in InGaN measured by photoluminescence20072026201320192007250500750

Peers

Nathan F. Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Condensed Matter Physics 2.8k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.0k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 1.2k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 743
Replace E. E. Haller with:
E. E. Haller United States
Minho Kim South Korea
T. H. Myers United States
S. Yu. Karpov Russia
T. Katayama Japan
L. Däweritz Germany
Gregor Koblmüller Germany
Katsumi Kishino Japan
F. Nizzoli Italy
Kazumi Wada Japan
Nathan F. Gardner relative to E. E. Haller United States E. E. Haller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
E. E. Haller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan F. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan F. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan F. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan F. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan F. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan F. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan F. Gardner. The network helps show where Nathan F. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan F. Gardner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan F. Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan F. Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan F. Gardner. Nathan F. Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 47
2 380
3
Auger recombination in InGaN measured by photoluminescencebreakdown →
940
4 175
5 317
6 30
7 7
8 1
9 98
10
Radiometric characterisation supports, burnup credit, safeguards and radionuclide inventory determination for spent fuel transport, storage and disposal
1
11 38
12 350
13 5
14 1
15 6
16 6
17 17
18 31
19 15
20 36

About Nathan F. Gardner

Nathan F. Gardner is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and General Materials Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (20 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (18 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (2.8k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.0k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (743 citations). Nathan F. Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Krames, Yinchu Shen, Satoshi Watanabe, Gerd Mueller, A. Munkholm, Jonathan J. Wierer, Werner Götz, Aurélien David, S. A. Stockman and M. G. Craford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026