Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Construction of Preference
2006569 citationsSarah Lichtenstein, Cass R. Sunstein et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
The Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model: How self‐discrepancies drive consumer behavior
Citations per year, relative to Naomi Mandel Naomi Mandel (= 1×)
peers
Katherine White
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Mandel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Mandel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Mandel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Mandel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Mandel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Mandel. The network helps show where Naomi Mandel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Mandel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Mandel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Mandel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Mandel. Naomi Mandel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mandel, Naomi, et al.. (2017). Putting on a Show Or Showing My True Self? Exploring Consumers’ Desire to Signal Accurate Versus Enhanced Identities. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Ruvio, Ayalla, Naomi Mandel, & Élodie Gentina. (2016). Reciprocal Altruism As a Motivation For Sharing: Sharing Up Verses Sharing Down. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
8.
Fernandes, Daniel Silva, Naomi Mandel, & Dirk Smeesters. (2010). The Spice of Life: Effects of Mortality Anxiety on Preference For Variety. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Scott, Maura L., Stephen M. Nowlis, & Naomi Mandel. (2009). Consumer Usage of Ultra-Concentrated Products. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
11.
Smeesters, Dirk, et al.. (2009). “Still Preoccupied With 1985: the Effect of Imagined Interaction on Preference For Nostalgic Products”. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
12.
Smeesters, Dirk, Thomas Mussweiler, & Naomi Mandel. (2008). The Effects of Thin and Heavy Media Images on Overweight and Underweight Consumers. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
13.
Scott, Maura L., Stephen M. Nowlis, Naomi Mandel, & Andrea C. Morales. (2008). Do Diet Foods Make Consumers Heavier? the Effect of Reduced Calorie Packages on the Consumption Behavior of Dieters and Non-Dieters. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
14.
Mandel, Naomi & Dirk Smeesters. (2008). The Sweet Escape: Effects of Mortality Salience on Consumption Quantities for High- and Low-Self-Esteem Consumers. EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam).1 indexed citations
Mandel, Naomi & Dirk Smeesters. (2007). Shop ‘Til You Drop: the Effect of Mortality Salience on Consumption Quantity. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
17.
Lichtenstein, Sarah, Cass R. Sunstein, Paul Slovic, et al.. (2006). The Construction of Preference. Cambridge University Press eBooks.569 indexed citations breakdown →
Mandel, Naomi & Steven J. Heine. (1999). Terror Management and Marketing: He Who Dies With the Most Toys Wins. ACR North American Advances.100 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.