Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Construction of Preference
2006569 citationsSarah Lichtenstein, Cass R. Sunstein et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Simon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Simon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Simon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Simon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Simon. The network helps show where Dan Simon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Simon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Simon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Simon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Simon. Dan Simon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Simon, Dan. (2025). The Adversarial Bias. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 21(1). 359–377.
2.
Simon, Dan. (2019). Minimizing Error and Bias in Death Investigations. Seton Hall Law Review. 49(2). 1.3 indexed citations
3.
Simon, Dan & Stephen A. Spiller. (2016). The Elasticity of Preferences. Psychological Science. 27(12). 1588–1599.15 indexed citations
Read, Stephen J., Dan Simon, & Douglas M. Stenstrom. (2010). Hot Cognitions in Coherence-Based Reasoning and Decision-Making. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).1 indexed citations
Lichtenstein, Sarah, Cass R. Sunstein, Paul Slovic, et al.. (2006). The Construction of Preference. Cambridge University Press eBooks.569 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Simon, Dan. (2004). A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making. The University of Chicago Law Review. 71(2). 511–586.94 indexed citations
14.
Simon, Dan, Daniel C. Krawczyk, & Keith J. Holyoak. (2004). Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction. SSRN Electronic Journal.10 indexed citations
Read, Stephen J., et al.. (2003). Constraint Satisfaction Processes in Social Reasoning. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 25(25).9 indexed citations
17.
Simon, Dan. (2002). Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Look Through the Lens of Cognitive Psychology. Brooklyn law review. 67(4). 1097.5 indexed citations
Simon, Dan. (1994). The Demolition of Homes in the Israeli Occupied Territories. The Yale journal of international law. 19(1). 2.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.