Mónica Correa
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Miguél NussbaumXimena LópezFrancisca LagosPatricia FloresMarcela SalinasRicardo RosasValeska GrauPatricio Cumsille
- Topics
- Educational Innovations and Technology (2 papers)Knowledge Societies in the 21st Century (2 papers)E-Learning and Knowledge Management (2 papers)
- Journals
- Computers & EducationPsykhe (Santiago)Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I)
In The Last Decade
Mónica Correa
5 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 361
- Education 176
- Sociology and Political Science 144
- Computer Science Applications 113
- Information Systems 98
Countries citing papers authored by Mónica Correa
This map shows the geographic impact of Mónica Correa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mónica Correa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mónica Correa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mónica Correa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mónica Correa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mónica Correa. The network helps show where Mónica Correa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mónica Correa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mónica Correa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mónica Correa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mónica Correa. Mónica Correa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Aporte de las prácticas de campo a la construcción del conocimiento profesional de futuros profesores de biología | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Capitalismo del conocimiento: alternativas de desarrollo nacional en el software libre y de fuente abierta | 2 |
| 6 | 468 | |
| 7 | 6 |
About Mónica Correa
Mónica Correa is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Demography and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Innovations and Technology (2 papers), Knowledge Societies in the 21st Century (2 papers) and E-Learning and Knowledge Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (361 citations), Computer Science Applications (113 citations) and Education (176 citations). Mónica Correa has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Mexico and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Miguél Nussbaum, Ximena López, Francisca Lagos, Patricia Flores, Marcela Salinas, Ricardo Rosas, Valeska Grau, Patricio Cumsille, Vladimir Marianov and Patricio Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Psykhe (Santiago) and Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.