Mina R. McDaniel

1.8k total citations
37 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Mina R. McDaniel is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mina R. McDaniel has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Food Science, 12 papers in Plant Science and 7 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Mina R. McDaniel's work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (15 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (12 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers). Mina R. McDaniel is often cited by papers focused on Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (15 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (12 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers). Mina R. McDaniel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Yemen and South Korea. Mina R. McDaniel's co-authors include Barney Watson, Yanyun Zhao, Steven J. Harper, Cindy Lederer, Anne Plotto, James P. Mattheis, Rita Miranda‐López, Leonard M. Libbey, N.J.N. Yau and F. W. Bodyfelt and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Dairy Science and Journal of Food Science.

In The Last Decade

Mina R. McDaniel

36 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mina R. McDaniel United States 22 694 452 326 164 162 37 1.2k
Elisabetta Moneta Italy 25 660 1.0× 645 1.4× 364 1.1× 198 1.2× 222 1.4× 55 1.6k
Héctor B. Escalona‐Buendía Mexico 23 1.2k 1.7× 487 1.1× 274 0.8× 125 0.8× 296 1.8× 72 2.0k
João de Deus Souza Carneiro Brazil 18 587 0.8× 262 0.6× 360 1.1× 71 0.4× 158 1.0× 73 1.1k
Emira Mehinagic France 19 901 1.3× 878 1.9× 297 0.9× 99 0.6× 295 1.8× 40 1.6k
Ulla Kidmose Denmark 27 756 1.1× 614 1.4× 592 1.8× 158 1.0× 343 2.1× 81 1.9k
Nathalie Cayot France 23 1.1k 1.5× 323 0.7× 528 1.6× 223 1.4× 94 0.6× 56 1.5k
Anne Gunson New Zealand 20 610 0.9× 1.5k 3.3× 168 0.5× 96 0.6× 250 1.5× 29 1.9k
Nicola Condelli Italy 22 867 1.2× 294 0.7× 512 1.6× 69 0.4× 226 1.4× 44 1.4k
S. Bayarri Spain 25 1.3k 1.8× 273 0.6× 846 2.6× 75 0.5× 56 0.3× 42 1.7k
Zoltán Kókai Hungary 17 354 0.5× 197 0.4× 217 0.7× 203 1.2× 89 0.5× 61 882

Countries citing papers authored by Mina R. McDaniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mina R. McDaniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mina R. McDaniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mina R. McDaniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mina R. McDaniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mina R. McDaniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mina R. McDaniel. The network helps show where Mina R. McDaniel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mina R. McDaniel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mina R. McDaniel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mina R. McDaniel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mina R. McDaniel. Mina R. McDaniel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chung, Seo‐Jin, et al.. (2010). Sweetness preferences for a sports-drink among US and Asian consumers. Food Science and Biotechnology. 19(2). 349–360. 12 indexed citations
2.
McDaniel, Mina R., et al.. (2009). FORMULATING A NEW PASSION FRUIT JUICE BEVERAGE WITH DIFFERENT SWEETENER SYSTEMS. Journal of Sensory Studies. 24(5). 698–711. 18 indexed citations
3.
McDaniel, Mina R., et al.. (2006). SEASONAL VARIABILITY OF CHEDDAR CHEESE WHEY POWDER: A CASE STUDY. Journal of Food Quality. 29(5). 543–551. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lederer, Cindy, et al.. (2005). Sensory Evaluation of Fresh Strawberries ( Fragaria ananassa ) Coated with Chitosan‐based Edible Coatings. Journal of Food Science. 70(3). 102 indexed citations
5.
McDaniel, Mina R., et al.. (2004). Suppression of sourness: A comparative study involving mixtures of organic acids and sugars. Perception & Psychophysics. 66(4). 642–650. 23 indexed citations
6.
Plotto, Anne, Mina R. McDaniel, & James P. Mattheis. (2000). Characterization of Changes in `Gala' Apple Aroma during Storage Using Osme Analysis, a Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry Technique. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 125(6). 714–722. 55 indexed citations
7.
Watson, Barney, et al.. (1999). Effects of Macerating Pectinase Enzymes on Color, Phenolic Profile, and Sensory Character of Pinot noir Wines 1998-1999. 3 indexed citations
8.
Plotto, Anne, Anita N. Azarenko, Mina R. McDaniel, Patrick W. Crockett, & James P. Mattheis. (1997). Eating Quality of `Gala' and `Fuji' Apples from Multiple Harvests and Storage Durations. HortScience. 32(5). 903–908. 18 indexed citations
9.
McDaniel, Mina R., et al.. (1997). Raw Hop Aroma Qualities by Trained Panel Free-Choice Profiling. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists. 55(2). 65–72. 13 indexed citations
10.
McDaniel, Mina R., et al.. (1996). II-17. Sensory effects of quercetin in a model wine and a chardonnay. Food Quality and Preference. 7(3-4). 339–340. 1 indexed citations
11.
Barrett, Diane M., et al.. (1995). Sweet Corn Germ Enzymes Affect Odor Formation. Journal of Food Science. 60(5). 1034–1040. 16 indexed citations
12.
Yang, Xiaogen, Max L. Deinzer, Cindy Lederer, & Mina R. McDaniel. (1994). Statistical Analysis with Weighting Factors: Hop Aroma in Beer. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists. 52(4). 155–162. 3 indexed citations
13.
Wrolstad, Ronald E., et al.. (1993). Composition and Sensory Characterization of Red Raspberry Juice Concentrated by Direct‐Osmosis or Evaporation. Journal of Food Science. 58(3). 633–637. 54 indexed citations
14.
McDaniel, Mina R., et al.. (1992). An Evaluation of Combinations of Wine Yeast andLeuconostoc oenosStrains in Malolactic Fermentation of Chardonnay Wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 43(3). 253–260. 32 indexed citations
15.
Wightman, JoLynne D., Xiao Lan Xu, Brian M. Yorgey, et al.. (1992). Evaluation of Genetically Modified Wine Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 43(3). 283–289. 4 indexed citations
16.
Wightman, JoLynne D., Xu Xiao, Brian M. Yorgey, et al.. (1992). Evaluation of Genetically Modified Wine Strains ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 43(3). 283–289. 3 indexed citations
17.
Harper, Steven J., et al.. (1991). Prediction of Consumer Acceptability of Yogurt by Sensory and Analytical Measures of Sweetness and Sourness. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(11). 3746–3754. 46 indexed citations
18.
Harper, Steven J., et al.. (1991). Sensory Ratings of Commercial Plain Yogurts by Consumer and Descriptive Panels. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(9). 2927–2935. 36 indexed citations
19.
Clydesdale, Fergus M., et al.. (1978). The psychophysical relationships between color and flavor∗. C R C Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 10(3). 303–321. 29 indexed citations
20.
McDaniel, Mina R., et al.. (1971). Odor and optical activity. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026