Michael Leatherbee

912 total citations
13 papers, 539 citations indexed

About

Michael Leatherbee is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Leatherbee has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 539 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 6 papers in Accounting and 5 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Michael Leatherbee's work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (8 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (6 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 papers). Michael Leatherbee is often cited by papers focused on Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (8 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (6 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 papers). Michael Leatherbee collaborates with scholars based in Chile, United Kingdom and United States. Michael Leatherbee's co-authors include Juanita González-Uribe, Riitta Katila, Stephen X. Zhang, Antje Schmitt, Kathrin Rosing, Amanda Jasmine Williamson, Martina Battisti, Charles E. Eesley and Julio A. Pertuzé and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Financial Studies, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

In The Last Decade

Michael Leatherbee

11 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Michael Leatherbee
Joanne L. Scillitoe United States
Reiner Braun Germany
Emily Neubert United States
Daniel V. Holland United States
Jing Xi China
Gergana Markova United States
Mark T. Schenkel United States
Joanne L. Scillitoe United States
Michael Leatherbee
Citations per year, relative to Michael Leatherbee Michael Leatherbee (= 1×) peers Joanne L. Scillitoe

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Leatherbee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Leatherbee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Leatherbee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Leatherbee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Leatherbee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Leatherbee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Leatherbee. The network helps show where Michael Leatherbee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Leatherbee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Leatherbee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Leatherbee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Leatherbee. Michael Leatherbee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
2.
3.
Pertuzé, Julio A., et al.. (2022). More structure or better social practices? Using a contingency lens to address ambidexterity gaps in innovative SMEs. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 18(12). 5581–5606. 7 indexed citations
4.
Leatherbee, Michael & Riitta Katila. (2020). The lean startup method: Early‐stage teams and hypothesis‐based probing of business ideas. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 14(4). 570–593. 125 indexed citations
5.
Zhang, Stephen X., et al.. (2020). A microfoundational model of real options reasoning: The roles of individual search propensity and perceived uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 15(1). 98–120. 15 indexed citations
6.
Williamson, Amanda Jasmine, et al.. (2018). Rest, Zest, and My Innovative Best: Sleep and Mood as Drivers of Entrepreneurs’ Innovative Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 43(3). 582–610. 46 indexed citations
7.
González-Uribe, Juanita & Michael Leatherbee. (2017). The Effects of Business Accelerators on Venture Performance: Evidence from Start-Up Chile. Review of Financial Studies. 31(4). 1566–1603. 165 indexed citations
8.
Schmitt, Antje, Kathrin Rosing, Stephen X. Zhang, & Michael Leatherbee. (2017). A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Uncertainty and Business Opportunity Identification: Exploration as a Mediator and Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as a Moderator. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 42(6). 835–859. 122 indexed citations
9.
Leatherbee, Michael & Juanita González-Uribe. (2017). The Effects of Business Accelerators on Venture Performance: Evidence from Start-Up Chile. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 11659–11659. 15 indexed citations
10.
Leatherbee, Michael & Riitta Katila. (2017). Stay the Course or Pivot? Antecedents of Cognitive Refinements of Business Models in Young Firms (WITHDRAWN). Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 10496–10496. 5 indexed citations
11.
Leatherbee, Michael & Riitta Katila. (2016). Stay the Course or Pivot? Antecedents of Cognitive Refinements of Business Models in Young Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations
12.
González-Uribe, Juanita & Michael Leatherbee. (2015). Business Accelerators: Evidence from Start-Up Chile. SSRN Electronic Journal. 16 indexed citations
13.
Leatherbee, Michael & Charles E. Eesley. (2014). Boulevard of Broken Behaviors: Socio-Psychological Mechanisms of Entrepreneurship Policies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026