Melissa J. Williams
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer L. EberhardtPhillip Atiba GoffMatthew Christian JacksonJulie Spencer‐RodgersLarissa Z. TiedensKaiping PengErrol R. HoffmannGerald W. Chodak
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological Bulletin
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Melissa J. Williams
48 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
- Social Psychology 880
- Gender Studies 333
- Cognitive Neuroscience 329
- Clinical Psychology 229
Countries citing papers authored by Melissa J. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa J. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa J. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa J. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa J. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa J. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa J. Williams. The network helps show where Melissa J. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melissa J. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melissa J. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melissa J. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melissa J. Williams. Melissa J. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Using Three Lenses to Critically Engage with Global Texts | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 210 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 337 | |
| 16 | Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences.breakdown → | 530 |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 84 | |
| 19 | 93 | |
| 20 | 72 |
About Melissa J. Williams
Melissa J. Williams is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (880 citations), Gender Studies (333 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations). Melissa J. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Eberhardt, Phillip Atiba Goff, Matthew Christian Jackson, Julie Spencer‐Rodgers, Larissa Z. Tiedens, Kaiping Peng, Errol R. Hoffmann, Gerald W. Chodak, Gregory T. Bales and Kaiping Peng. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Psychological Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.