Desirée Burgh
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility 2
-
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 5
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 2
-
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 5
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 2
-
- Estrogen and related hormone effects 2
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 2
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 1
- Co-authors
- Laura N. GitlinRonald E. MyersThomas WolfGerald W. ChodakLinda J. McKeeGail A. NelsonGregg NelsonTerry Hyslop
- Cited by
- Occupational TherapyOncologyHealth
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Desirée Burgh
12 papers receiving 468 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Occupational Therapy 106
- Oncology 207
- Health 47
- Applied Psychology 27
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Desirée Burgh
This map shows the geographic impact of Desirée Burgh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Desirée Burgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Desirée Burgh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Desirée Burgh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Desirée Burgh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Desirée Burgh. The network helps show where Desirée Burgh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Desirée Burgh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 5 | Intention to be tested for prostate cancer risk among African-American men. | 2000 | 63 |
| 6 | 1999 | 84 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 93 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 80 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 28 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 39 |
About Desirée Burgh
Desirée Burgh is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 12 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (106 citations), Oncology (207 citations), Health (47 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations). Desirée Burgh has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Laura N. Gitlin, Ronald E. Myers, Thomas Wolf, Gerald W. Chodak, Linda J. McKee, Gail A. Nelson, Gregg Nelson, Terry Hyslop, Melissa J. Williams and Sue M. Marcus. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Urology, Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.