Gerald W. Chodak
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.2%
- Surgery top 1%
- Oncology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 1%
- Co-authors
- Glenn S. GerberDaniel B. RukstalisMichael SinnerRonald A. ThistedTakahisa NakamotoDavid CellaFei MoKenneth J. Pienta
- Topics
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (68 papers)Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (68 papers)Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Gerald W. Chodak
134 papers receiving 6.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 4.2k
- Surgery 1.9k
- Oncology 1.8k
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 844
Countries citing papers authored by Gerald W. Chodak
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerald W. Chodak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerald W. Chodak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerald W. Chodak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerald W. Chodak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerald W. Chodak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerald W. Chodak. The network helps show where Gerald W. Chodak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerald W. Chodak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerald W. Chodak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerald W. Chodak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gerald W. Chodak. Gerald W. Chodak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 68 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 165 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 93 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 50 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 84 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Wound infections and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery. A review. | 9 |
About Gerald W. Chodak
Gerald W. Chodak is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Urology and Oncology, having authored 135 papers that have together received 7.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (68 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (68 papers) and Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.2k citations), Urology (560 citations) and Oncology (1.8k citations). Gerald W. Chodak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Glenn S. Gerber, Daniel B. Rukstalis, Michael Sinner, Ronald A. Thisted, Takahisa Nakamoto, David Cella, Fei Mo, Kenneth J. Pienta, Peg Esper and Simon Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Chemical Society and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.