Mei Peng

2.1k total citations
85 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Mei Peng is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mei Peng has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Sensory Systems, 28 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 24 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Mei Peng's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (30 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (27 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (23 papers). Mei Peng is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (30 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (27 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (23 papers). Mei Peng collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and China. Mei Peng's co-authors include Yusuf Özgür Çakmak, Michael J. Hautus, Indrawati Oey, Weimin Sun, Charles M. Strom, Franklin Quan, Joy B. Redman, Sara R. Jaeger, Duncan Coutts and Ting Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mei Peng

75 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mei Peng

PRM

Hajime Nagai Japan

Michela Codini Italy

María R. Aburto Ireland

Eduardo Sainz United States

Rafał Butowt Poland

Søren Peter Lund Denmark

Luigi Maiolino Italy

Weiyi Zhang China

Agostino Serra Italy

Ferdi Engels Netherlands

Hajime Nagai Japan

Mei Peng

257 ×0.6

164 ×0.4

143 ×0.5

149 ×0.8

PRM

96 ×0.5

Citations per year, relative to Mei Peng Mei Peng (= 1×) peers Hajime Nagai

Countries citing papers authored by Mei Peng

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mei Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mei Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mei Peng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mei Peng

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mei Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mei Peng. The network helps show where Mei Peng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mei Peng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mei Peng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mei Peng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mei Peng. Mei Peng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chen, Kelong, et al.. (2025). Study on consumers’ electric vehicle choice preferences in severe cold regions: Based on choice experiments in Heilongjiang province. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 19(4). 308–321. 1 indexed citations

Oey, Indrawati, et al.. (2025). PregNut survey: knowledge, attitude, and practices of midwives regarding plant-based diets during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 25(1). 434–434.

Peng, Mei, et al.. (2025). The Impact of Parent–Child Relationships on the Mental Health of Returnee Children: The Role of Social Support and Psychological Resilience. Child & Family Social Work.

Walpita, Janitha, et al.. (2024). Evaluating sensory impacts of sustained Plant-Based Diets: Altered sensitivity and hedonic responses to Meat-Related odours in Sri Lankan young adults. Food Quality and Preference. 117. 105151–105151.

Leong, Sze Ying, Esther H.‐J. Kim, Marco P. Morgenstern, et al.. (2024). Texture Evaluation and In Vivo Oral Tactile Perceptions of Cooked Wheat Pasta Sheets Partially Substituted with Pea Protein. Foods. 13(23). 3798–3798.

Peng, Mei, et al.. (2024). Impacts of motherhood on energy intake and macronutrient choice: A comparative study. Food Quality and Preference. 125. 105370–105370.

Oey, Indrawati, et al.. (2024). Knowledge, attitude and practices of health professionals with regard to plant-based diets in pregnancy: a scoping review. Public Health Nutrition. 27(1). e170–e170. 2 indexed citations

Turner, Samantha J., et al.. (2024). Does vaping affect the taste and smell perception? An exploratory study with New Zealand young adults. Appetite. 195. 107236–107236. 1 indexed citations

Peng, Mei, Yuan Gong, Junnan Li, et al.. (2023). What contributes to the re-positive nucleic acid test results for the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in the shelter cabin hospital in Shanghai, China?. Heliyon. 9(5). e15679–e15679. 1 indexed citations

10.

Garratt, Michael, et al.. (2023). Gustatory and olfactory shifts during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiology & Behavior. 273. 114388–114388. 5 indexed citations

11.

Oey, Indrawati, et al.. (2022). Testing Links of Food-Related Olfactory Perception to Peripheral Ghrelin and Leptin Concentrations. Frontiers in Nutrition. 9. 888608–888608. 12 indexed citations

12.

Peng, Mei, et al.. (2021). Olfactory shifts linked to postpartum depression. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 14947–14947. 7 indexed citations

13.

Haszard, Jillian J., et al.. (2020). Cognitive performance, mood and satiety following ingestion of beverages imparting different glycaemic responses: a randomised double-blind crossover trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 75(4). 602–610. 5 indexed citations

14.

Xu, Zhe, Wei Bo Li, Jun Jiang, et al.. (2017). Characteristic of entire corneal topography and tomography for the detection of sub-clinical keratoconus with Zernike polynomials using Pentacam. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 16486–16486. 41 indexed citations

15.

Peng, Mei, Sara R. Jaeger, & Michael J. Hautus. (2013). Fitting Psychometric Functions Using a Fixed-Slope Parameter: An Advanced Alternative for Estimating Odor Thresholds With Data Generated by ASTM E679. Chemical Senses. 39(3). 229–241. 6 indexed citations

16.

Jaeger, Sara R., Jeremy F. McRae, Christina M. Bava, et al.. (2013). A Mendelian Trait for Olfactory Sensitivity Affects Odor Experience and Food Selection. Current Biology. 23(16). 1601–1605. 122 indexed citations

17.

Strom, Charles M., Beryl Crossley, Ke Zhang, et al.. (2012). Testing for variants in CYP2C19: population frequencies and testing experience in a clinical laboratory. Genetics in Medicine. 14(1). 95–100. 64 indexed citations

18.

Hantash, Feras, et al.. (2009). Apparent Homozygosity of a Novel Frame Shift Mutation in the CFTR Gene Because of a Large Deletion. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 11(3). 253–256. 14 indexed citations

19.

Strom, Charles M., Beryl Crossley, Joy B. Redman, et al.. (2004). Cystic fibrosis screening: Lessons learned from the first 320,000 patients. Genetics in Medicine. 6(3). 136–140. 24 indexed citations

20.

Strom, Charles M., Donghui Huang, Christina Chen, et al.. (2003). Extensive sequencing of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene: Assay validation and unexpected benefits of developing a comprehensive test. Genetics in Medicine. 5(1). 9–14. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact