Matthijs Smakman
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Safety Research top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Education
- Co-authors
- Elly A. KonijnPaul VogtMaurizio CaonCristina BaroglioMarija SlavkovikMaite López-SánchezMarlies van SteenbergenKoen Smit
- Topics
- AI in Service Interactions (10 papers)Social Robot Interaction and HRI (10 papers)Online and Blended Learning (3 papers)
- Journals
- Computers & EducationReview of Educational ResearchJournal of the Association for Information Systems
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsLuxembourgUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matthijs Smakman
16 papers receiving 212 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Artificial Intelligence 95
- Social Psychology 93
- Safety Research 54
- Computer Science Applications 35
- Education 29
Countries citing papers authored by Matthijs Smakman
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthijs Smakman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthijs Smakman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthijs Smakman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthijs Smakman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthijs Smakman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthijs Smakman. The network helps show where Matthijs Smakman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthijs Smakman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthijs Smakman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthijs Smakman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthijs Smakman. Matthijs Smakman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About Matthijs Smakman
Matthijs Smakman is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in Service Interactions (10 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (10 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (12 citations), Computer Science Applications (35 citations) and Safety Research (54 citations). Matthijs Smakman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Luxembourg and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elly A. Konijn, Paul Vogt, Maurizio Caon, Cristina Baroglio, Marija Slavkovik, Maite López-Sánchez, Marlies van Steenbergen, Koen Smit, Matteo Baldoni and Virginia Dignum. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Review of Educational Research and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.