This map shows the geographic impact of Koen Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen Smit more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen Smit. The network helps show where Koen Smit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Koen Smit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Koen Smit.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Koen Smit based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Koen Smit. Koen Smit is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2020). A Review of AI Principles in Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.7 indexed citations
8.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2020). Decision Rights and Governance within the Blockchain Domain: a literature analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 197.7 indexed citations
9.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2020). Future Challenges in Decision Mining at Governmental Institutions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2018). Applying the Decision Model and Notation in Practice: A Method to Design and Specify Business Decisions and Business Logic. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 39.1 indexed citations
12.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2018). Identifying Factors Affecting Blockchain Technology Diffusion. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.16 indexed citations
13.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2018). An Organizational Capability and Resource-Based Perspective on Business Rules Management. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
14.
Woutersen, Marjolijn, et al.. (2017). Prioritisation tool for chemical substances in consumer products. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
15.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2017). Identifying Challenges in BRM Implementations Regarding the Verification and Validation Capabilities at Governmental Institutions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 201.3 indexed citations
16.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2017). Functional Requirements for Business Rules Management Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–10.3 indexed citations
17.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2016). A framework for traceability of legal requirements in the Dutch Governmental context. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2016(260). 38.5 indexed citations
18.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2016). Utilizing change effort prediction to analyze modifiability of business rule architectures at the NHS. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 261.1 indexed citations
19.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2015). A Classification of Modification Categories for Business Rules. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 28. 3.1 indexed citations
20.
Smit, Koen, et al.. (2014). Business model for business rules. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 26.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.