Mathilde Lamotte

414 total citations
10 papers, 313 citations indexed

About

Mathilde Lamotte is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Mathilde Lamotte has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 313 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Mathilde Lamotte's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers) and Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper). Mathilde Lamotte is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers) and Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper). Mathilde Lamotte collaborates with scholars based in France and Luxembourg. Mathilde Lamotte's co-authors include Sylvie Droit‐Volet, Sandrine Gil, Sophie Fayolle, Mickaël Jury, Caroline Desombre, Marie Izaute, Marie Izaute, N. Chakroun, Céline Darnon and M Grivaux and has published in prestigious journals such as Consciousness and Cognition, Educational Psychology and Journal of Cognitive Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mathilde Lamotte

9 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mathilde Lamotte France	6	198	142	68	50	36	10	313
Darlene DeMarie United States	9	126 0.6×	48 0.3×	55 0.8×	174 3.5×	39 1.1×	19	370
Gabriela Krumm Argentina	9	138 0.7×	231 1.6×	57 0.8×	90 1.8×	13 0.4×	34	371
Anat Kasirer Israel	9	231 1.2×	237 1.7×	53 0.8×	57 1.1×	8 0.2×	12	396
Sietske W. Kleibeuker Netherlands	9	288 1.5×	340 2.4×	65 1.0×	46 0.9×	6 0.2×	9	468
Mary Elizabeth Sutherland United States	7	141 0.7×	44 0.3×	54 0.8×	36 0.7×	17 0.5×	16	234
Lisa K. Burger United States	8	285 1.4×	129 0.9×	74 1.1×	72 1.4×	46 1.3×	9	491
Deanna C. Friesen Canada	13	332 1.7×	86 0.6×	27 0.4×	53 1.1×	11 0.3×	30	478
Ritva Torppa Finland	11	363 1.8×	99 0.7×	46 0.7×	22 0.4×	17 0.5×	15	412
Mariale M. Hardiman United States	9	120 0.6×	97 0.7×	23 0.3×	164 3.3×	9 0.3×	15	352
Anna‐Lena Roos Switzerland	8	45 0.2×	118 0.8×	90 1.3×	86 1.7×	18 0.5×	14	256

Countries citing papers authored by Mathilde Lamotte

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathilde Lamotte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathilde Lamotte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathilde Lamotte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathilde Lamotte

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathilde Lamotte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathilde Lamotte. The network helps show where Mathilde Lamotte may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mathilde Lamotte

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mathilde Lamotte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mathilde Lamotte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mathilde Lamotte. Mathilde Lamotte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Lamotte, Mathilde, Marie Izaute, & Céline Darnon. (2021). Can tests improve learning in real university classrooms?. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 33(8). 974–992. 5 indexed citations

2.

Desombre, Caroline, Mathilde Lamotte, & Mickaël Jury. (2018). French teachers’ general attitude toward inclusion: the indirect effect of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology. 39(1). 38–50. 66 indexed citations

3.

Lamotte, Mathilde, Sylvie Droit‐Volet, & Marie Izaute. (2017). Confidence judgment in a temporal generalization task: Accuracy and sensitivity to task difficulty. L’Année psychologique. 117(3). 275–298. 5 indexed citations

4.

Lamotte, Mathilde, Sylvie Droit‐Volet, & Marie Izaute. (2017). Confidence judgment in a temporal generalization task: Accuracy and sensitivity to task difficulty. L’Année psychologique. 1–24. 1 indexed citations

5.

Lamotte, Mathilde & Sylvie Droit‐Volet. (2017). Aging and Time Perception for Short and Long Durations: A Question of Attention?. Timing & Time Perception. 5(2). 149–167. 24 indexed citations

6.

Droit‐Volet, Sylvie, Mathilde Lamotte, & Marie Izaute. (2015). The conscious awareness of time distortions regulates the effect of emotion on the perception of time. Consciousness and Cognition. 38. 155–164. 28 indexed citations

7.

Lamotte, Mathilde, N. Chakroun, Sylvie Droit‐Volet, & Marie Izaute. (2014). Metacognitive Questionnaire on Time: Feeling of the Passage of Time. Timing & Time Perception. 2(3). 339–359. 36 indexed citations

8.

Droit‐Volet, Sylvie, Sophie Fayolle, Mathilde Lamotte, & Sandrine Gil. (2013). Time, Emotion and the Embodiment of Timing. Timing & Time Perception. 1(1). 99–126. 113 indexed citations

9.

Lamotte, Mathilde, Marie Izaute, & Sylvie Droit‐Volet. (2012). Awareness of time distortions and its relation with time judgment: A metacognitive approach. Consciousness and Cognition. 21(2). 835–842. 34 indexed citations

10.

Lamotte, Mathilde, et al.. (1962). [Sensory polyneuritic form of lead poisoning].. PubMed. 76. 531–4. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact