Countries where authors publish in L’Année psychologique
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in L’Année psychologique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in L’Année psychologique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L’Année psychologique more than expected).
Fields of papers published in L’Année psychologique
This network shows the impact of papers published in L’Année psychologique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in L’Année psychologique.
About L’Année psychologique
The 1.4k papers published in L’Année psychologique in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations . Papers published in L’Année psychologique usually cover General Psychology (57 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (338 papers) and Linguistics and Language (107 papers) specifically the topics of Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (193 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (133 papers), French Language Learning Methods (101 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (99 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (95 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (89 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (84 papers) and Social Representations and Identity (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in L’Année psychologique are Ludovic Ferrand, Monique Radeau, Alain Content, Philippe Mousty, Boris New, Serge Nicolas, Ariane Lévy-Schoen, Markus Bräuer, Paul Fraisse and Claude Bonnet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.