Mary K. Schmidl
- Food Science top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Animal Science and Zoology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Theodore P. LabuzaSteve L. TaylorJulie A. NordleeL. F. HOODW.F. ShipeR. E. McDonaldDavid B. MinJean Fincher Chabot
- Topics
- Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (2 papers)Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers)Bartonella species infections research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mary K. Schmidl
8 papers receiving 250 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Food Science 145
- Nutrition and Dietetics 77
- Molecular Biology 67
- Plant Science 66
- Animal Science and Zoology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Mary K. Schmidl
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary K. Schmidl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary K. Schmidl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary K. Schmidl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary K. Schmidl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary K. Schmidl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary K. Schmidl. The network helps show where Mary K. Schmidl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary K. Schmidl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary K. Schmidl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary K. Schmidl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary K. Schmidl. Mary K. Schmidl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Essentials of functional foods | 35 |
| 2 | The role of lipids in medical and designer foods. | 1 |
| 3 | Controlling bacterial contamination of an enteral formula through the use of a unique closed system: contamination, enteral formulas, closed system. | 20 |
| 4 | Use of hydrolysate-based products in special medical diets | 61 |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | Use of sensory data in the shelf life testing of foods: principles and graphical methods for evaluation | 42 |
| 7 | Accelerated shelf-life testing of foods | 114 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | [ON THE PATHOGENESIS OF CHRONIC URTICARIA]. | 2 |
About Mary K. Schmidl
Mary K. Schmidl is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Food Science and Parasitology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (2 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers) and Bartonella species infections research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (145 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (64 citations) and Biochemistry (32 citations). Mary K. Schmidl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Theodore P. Labuza, Steve L. Taylor, Julie A. Nordlee, L. F. HOOD, W.F. Shipe, R. E. McDonald, David B. Min and Jean Fincher Chabot. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Food Science & Technology, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.