Mary Beth Pinto

3.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
54 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Mary Beth Pinto is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Beth Pinto has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 11 papers in Marketing and 9 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Mary Beth Pinto's work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (11 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers) and Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (5 papers). Mary Beth Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (11 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers) and Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (5 papers). Mary Beth Pinto collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Mary Beth Pinto's co-authors include Jeffrey K. Pinto, John E. Prescott, Diane H. Parente, Robin A. Coulter, Robin Higie Coulter, Phylis Mansfield, Peerasit Patanakul, Roger M. Nelson, Paul Beattie and Susan Priest and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Management Science and Physical Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Mary Beth Pinto

51 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functi... 1993 2026 2004 2015 1993 100 200 300 400 500
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation
    1993 546 citations Mary Beth Pinto, Jeffrey K. Pinto et al. profile →

Peers

Mary Beth Pinto
Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy United Kingdom
Stacy E. McManus United States
Donald R. Bacon United States
John Cunningham Canada
Sally Sambrook United Kingdom
Tiziana Casciaro Canada
Rebecca S. Lau Hong Kong
Christie M. Fuller United States
Lorenzo Lucianetti Italy
Mark Speece Thailand
Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy United Kingdom
Mary Beth Pinto
Citations per year, relative to Mary Beth Pinto Mary Beth Pinto (= 1×) peers Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Beth Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Beth Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Beth Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Beth Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Beth Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Beth Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Beth Pinto. The network helps show where Mary Beth Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Beth Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Beth Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Beth Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Beth Pinto. Mary Beth Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pinto, Jeffrey K., Peerasit Patanakul, & Mary Beth Pinto. (2017). “The aura of capability”: Gender bias in selection for a project manager job. International Journal of Project Management. 35(3). 420–431. 32 indexed citations
2.
Pinto, Mary Beth, et al.. (2016). Fit for life: A content analysis of fitness tracker brands use of Facebook in social media marketing. Journal of Brand Management. 24(1). 49–67. 56 indexed citations
3.
Pinto, Mary Beth & Wayne Anderson. (2013). A Little Knowledge Goes a Long Way: Student Expectation and Satisfaction with Hybrid Learning.. Journal of instructional pedagogies. 10. 18 indexed citations
4.
Pinto, Mary Beth & Phylis Mansfield. (2013). The Millennial Generation’s Use of Social Media as a Complaint Method: An Application to Higher Education. 13(1). 11–26. 3 indexed citations
5.
Robb, Cliff A. & Mary Beth Pinto. (2010). College Students and Credit Card Use: An Analysis of Financially At-Risk Students. College student journal. 44(4). 823–31. 21 indexed citations
6.
Pinto, Mary Beth & Phylis Mansfield. (2010). Thought Processes College Students Use When Evaluating Faculty: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE). 3(3). 55–62. 5 indexed citations
7.
Parente, Diane H., et al.. (2005). A Pre-Post Comparison of Service Operational Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction Under Open Access Scheduling. Health Care Management Review. 30(3). 220–228. 38 indexed citations
8.
Pinto, Mary Beth, et al.. (2001). Credit card solicitation policies in higher education: Does "protecting" our students make a difference?. Journal of college student development. 42(2). 169–173. 5 indexed citations
9.
Pinto, Mary Beth, et al.. (2001). College Student Performance and Credit Card Usage.. Journal of college student development. 42(1). 49–58. 51 indexed citations
10.
Pinto, Mary Beth, et al.. (1999). Customer Satisfaction and Consumer Responsibility. Health Marketing Quarterly. 17(2). 75–86. 7 indexed citations
11.
Pinto, Mary Beth, et al.. (1998). The Impact of Pharmaceutical Direct Advertising. Health Marketing Quarterly. 15(4). 89–101. 37 indexed citations
12.
Pinto, Mary Beth, et al.. (1995). The Impact of Office Characteristics on Satisfaction with Medical Care. Health Marketing Quarterly. 12(2). 43–54. 31 indexed citations
13.
Coulter, Robin A. & Mary Beth Pinto. (1995). Guilt appeals in advertising: What are their effects?. Journal of Applied Psychology. 80(6). 697–705. 174 indexed citations
14.
Gehrt, Kenneth C. & Mary Beth Pinto. (1993). Assessing the viability of situationally driven segmentation opportunities in the health care market.. PubMed. 38(2). 243–65. 8 indexed citations
15.
Gehrt, Kenneth C. & Mary Beth Pinto. (1991). The impact of situational factors on health care preferences: exploring the prospect of situationally based segmentation.. PubMed. 11(2). 41–52. 10 indexed citations
16.
Pinto, Mary Beth & Kenneth C. Gehrt. (1991). The Do-It-Yourself Health Care Consumer. Health Marketing Quarterly. 8(3-4). 97–106. 5 indexed citations
17.
Pinto, Mary Beth. (1990). Gaining Cooperation among Members of Hospital Project Teams. Hospital Topics. 68(1). 15–21. 4 indexed citations
18.
Gehrt, Kenneth C. & Mary Beth Pinto. (1990). An Exploration of the Applicability of Situational Segmentation in the Health Care Market. Health Marketing Quarterly. 7(1-2). 115–130. 1 indexed citations
19.
Pinto, Mary Beth & Jeffrey K. Pinto. (1990). Project Team Communication and Cross‐Functional Cooperation in New Program Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 7(3). 200–212. 143 indexed citations
20.
Pinto, Mary Beth. (1988). Cross-functional cooperation in the implementation of marketing decisions : the effects of superordinate goals, rules and procedures, and physical environment. UMI eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark Fenton‐O’Creevy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stacy E. McManus Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Donald R. Bacon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John Cunningham Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sally Sambrook Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tiziana Casciaro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca S. Lau Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christie M. Fuller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lorenzo Lucianetti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark Speece
Rankless by CCL
2026