Mark Baldwin

645 citations
28 papers · 395 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Baldwin

26 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Mark Baldwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Public Administration 153
  • General Health Professions 153
  • Computer Science Applications 33
  • Education 152
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 10
Replace Ray Jones with:
Ray Jones United Kingdom
Bella Ross Australia
Carol Hostetter United States
David Plowright United Kingdom
Lynn Sheridan Australia
Mary Ziegler United States
Bianca Montrosse‐Moorhead United States
Chris Husbands United Kingdom
Joakim Caspersen Norway
Ramona Maile Cutri United States
Mark Baldwin relative to Ray Jones United Kingdom Ray Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ray Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Baldwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Baldwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Baldwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Baldwin. The network helps show where Mark Baldwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Baldwin Line = papers co-authored together Mark Baldwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Social Work, Critical Reflection and the Learning Organization
200487
2 200638
3 201033
4 201229
5 199829
6 199926
7 199119
8 200019
9 202213
10 200212
11 201311
12 199211
13 195110
14 20099
15 19967
16 20217
17 19946
18 20085
19 20205
20 19984

About Mark Baldwin

Mark Baldwin is a scholar working on Public Administration, Education, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 28 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (13 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Research in Social Sciences (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (153 citations), General Health Professions (153 citations), Computer Science Applications (33 citations), Education (152 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (10 citations). Mark Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sue Black, Rachel Harrison, Jane Dalrymple, Jacqueline S. Thousand, Barbra Teater, Stephanie Butler, Martin Brown, Pamela Cowan, Enda Donlon and Julio Gimenez. Their work appears in journals such as Social Work Education, The British Journal of Social Work, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Innovative Higher Education and Teaching Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact