Countries where authors publish in Social Work Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Work Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Work Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Work Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Social Work Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Work Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Work Education.
About Social Work Education
The 2.3k papers published in Social Work Education in the last decades have received a total of 28.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Work Education usually cover Public Administration (1.8k papers), General Health Professions (1.2k papers) and Education (853 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (1.8k papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (607 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (390 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (330 papers), Research in Social Sciences (238 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (199 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (116 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Work Education are Harry Ferguson, Jan Fook, David Boud, Louise Grant, Christine Morley, Mel Gray, Gillian Ruch, Beth R. Crisp, John Carpenter and Paul Michael Garrett.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.