Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Covalent transition metal, lanthanide, and actinide tetrahydroborate complexes
1977593 citationsTobin J. Marks, John KolbChemical Reviewsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Kolb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Kolb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Kolb more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Kolb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Kolb. The network helps show where John Kolb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Kolb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Kolb.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Kolb based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Kolb. John Kolb is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Andersen, Michael, Sam Kumar, Moustafa AbdelBaky, et al.. (2019). WAVE: A Decentralized Authorization Framework with Transitive Delegation.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1375–1392.12 indexed citations
3.
Pardos, Zachary A., et al.. (2018). Distributed Representation of Misconceptions.. ICLS.1 indexed citations
4.
Noghabi, Shadi A., John Kolb, Peter Bodík, & Eduardo Cuervo. (2018). Steel: Simplified Development and Deployment of Edge-Cloud Applications..11 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Kaifei, John Kolb, Hyung‐Sin Kim, et al.. (2018). SnapLink. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 1(4). 1–27.19 indexed citations
Zhang, Ben, John Kolb, Douglas S. Chan, et al.. (2015). The Cloud is Not Enough: Saving IoT from the Cloud.. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 21–21.107 indexed citations
Kolb, John. (2002). SIGNAL PROCESSING ABOUT A DISTRIBUTED DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona).
12.
Berenson, Sarah B., et al.. (1999). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (20th, Raleigh, NC, October 31-November 3, 1998). Volume 1..2 indexed citations
Kolb, John, et al.. (1979). Surface chemistry and energy of untreated and thermally treated TATB and plastic bonded TATB composites. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).2 indexed citations
16.
Marks, Tobin J. & John Kolb. (1977). Covalent transition metal, lanthanide, and actinide tetrahydroborate complexes. Chemical Reviews. 77(2). 263–293.593 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.