Malcolm S. Allen
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 1%
- Co-authors
- Paul D. PrenzlerDanny R. BedgoodKevin RobardsMichael J. LaceyCurtis M. KaluaAndrea BishopHassan K. ObiedRoger L. N. Harris
- Topics
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (5 papers)Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (5 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Malcolm S. Allen
19 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Food Science 1.1k
- Organic Chemistry 893
- Plant Science 548
- Biochemistry 523
- Analytical Chemistry 319
Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm S. Allen
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm S. Allen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm S. Allen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm S. Allen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm S. Allen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm S. Allen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm S. Allen. The network helps show where Malcolm S. Allen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Malcolm S. Allen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Malcolm S. Allen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Malcolm S. Allen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Malcolm S. Allen. Malcolm S. Allen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | Pitching, Defense, and Three-Run Homers: The 1970 Baltimore Orioles | 0 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 74 | |
| 5 | 376 | |
| 6 | 136 | |
| 7 | Olive oil volatile compounds, flavour development and quality: A critical reviewbreakdown → | 541 |
| 8 | 71 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 106 | |
| 12 | 146 | |
| 13 | 172 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Malcolm S. Allen
Malcolm S. Allen is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Food Science and Biotechnology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (5 papers), Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (5 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (523 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (90 citations) and Food Science (1.1k citations). Malcolm S. Allen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul D. Prenzler, Danny R. Bedgood, Kevin Robards, Michael J. Lacey, Curtis M. Kalua, Andrea Bishop, Hassan K. Obied, Roger L. N. Harris, Regine Stockmann and Stephen Boyd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry and Tetrahedron Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.