Lynne Anderson‐Inman

635 total citations
30 papers, 447 citations indexed

About

Lynne Anderson‐Inman is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Lynne Anderson‐Inman has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 447 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 10 papers in Education and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Lynne Anderson‐Inman's work include Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). Lynne Anderson‐Inman is often cited by papers focused on Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). Lynne Anderson‐Inman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ukraine. Lynne Anderson‐Inman's co-authors include Mark Horney, Der-Thanq Chen, Jen Katz‐Buonincontro, Keith Smolkowski and Lisa A. Strycker and has published in prestigious journals such as Reading Research Quarterly, Exceptional Children and The Journal of Special Education.

In The Last Decade

Lynne Anderson‐Inman

26 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lynne Anderson‐Inman United States 12 250 238 78 67 50 30 447
Mark Horney United States 11 167 0.7× 212 0.9× 53 0.7× 71 1.1× 52 1.0× 20 387
Kelley Regan United States 16 295 1.2× 431 1.8× 85 1.1× 76 1.1× 19 0.4× 50 625
Anya S. Evmenova United States 15 225 0.9× 335 1.4× 141 1.8× 78 1.2× 41 0.8× 53 606
Michael F. Hock United States 12 381 1.5× 340 1.4× 114 1.5× 49 0.7× 14 0.3× 25 597
Joan L. Rankin‐Erickson United States 6 191 0.8× 195 0.8× 27 0.3× 29 0.4× 22 0.4× 8 388
Chuck Hitchcock 5 113 0.5× 268 1.1× 200 2.6× 40 0.6× 47 0.9× 6 469
Nigel Beacham United Kingdom 8 95 0.4× 196 0.8× 55 0.7× 36 0.5× 24 0.5× 30 341
Shirley S. Schwartz United States 11 670 2.7× 805 3.4× 113 1.4× 22 0.3× 61 1.2× 19 940
Tanya Santangelo United States 13 614 2.5× 832 3.5× 37 0.5× 50 0.7× 26 0.5× 18 997
Mary Beth Calhoon United States 13 454 1.8× 389 1.6× 94 1.2× 36 0.5× 19 0.4× 27 621

Countries citing papers authored by Lynne Anderson‐Inman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynne Anderson‐Inman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynne Anderson‐Inman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynne Anderson‐Inman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynne Anderson‐Inman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynne Anderson‐Inman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynne Anderson‐Inman. The network helps show where Lynne Anderson‐Inman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynne Anderson‐Inman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynne Anderson‐Inman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynne Anderson‐Inman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynne Anderson‐Inman. Lynne Anderson‐Inman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne, et al.. (2016). Strategies for Online Academic Research (SOAR). RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 8(1). 42–68. 1 indexed citations
2.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne, et al.. (2013). Teaching with Avatars: Video Tutorials for Online Learning and Digital Literacy. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2013(1). 1989–1989. 1 indexed citations
3.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne, et al.. (2009). Supported eText in Captioned Videos: A Comparison of Expanded versus Standard Captions on Student Comprehension of Educational Content. Journal of Special Education Technology. 24(3). 21–34. 9 indexed citations
4.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne & Mark Horney. (2007). Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly. 42(1). 153–160. 92 indexed citations
5.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1999). COMPUTER-BASED SOLUTIONS FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: EMERGING ISSUES. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 15(3). 239–249. 15 indexed citations
6.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne, et al.. (1998). Computer-Based Concept Mapping: Promoting Meaningful Learning in Science for Students with Disabilities. 5. 18 indexed citations
7.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne & Mark Horney. (1997). Computer-Based Concept Mapping: Enhancing Literacy with Tools for Visual Thinking (Technology Tidbits). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 40(4). 31–7. 17 indexed citations
8.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne & Mark Horney. (1997). Electronic Books for Secondary Students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 40(6). 19 indexed citations
9.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1997). OWLs: Online Writing Labs (Technology Tidbits). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 40(8). 5 indexed citations
10.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1996). Synchronous Writing Environments: Real-Time Interaction in Cyberspace (Technology Tidbits).. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 40(2). 3 indexed citations
11.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne, et al.. (1996). Spell Checking Strategies for Successful Students (Technology Tidbits).. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 39(6). 1 indexed citations
12.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1996). Computer-Assisted Outlining: Information Organization Made Easy (Technology Tidbits).. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 39(4). 5 indexed citations
13.
Chen, Der-Thanq, Mark Horney, & Lynne Anderson‐Inman. (1995). The Standardized States Technique: a utilization of cluster analysis in analyzing students' hypertext processing patterns. 4(1). 53–73. 2 indexed citations
14.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne, et al.. (1994). Beyond Notecards: Synthesizing Information with Electronic Study Tools.. ˜The œComputing teacher. 21(8). 21–25. 6 indexed citations
15.
Horney, Mark & Lynne Anderson‐Inman. (1994). The electrotext project: hypertext reading patterns of middle school students. 3(1). 71–91. 35 indexed citations
16.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne, et al.. (1993). Computer-Based Concept Mapping: Active Studying for Active Learners.. ˜The œComputing teacher. 21(1). 49 indexed citations
17.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1991). Enabling Students with Learning Disabilities: Insights from Research.. ˜The œComputing teacher. 18(4). 26–29. 7 indexed citations
18.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1990). Enhancing the Reading-Writing Connection: Classroom Applications.. 7(3). 12–15. 2 indexed citations
19.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1989). Electronic Studying: Information Organizers to Help Students to Study "Better" not "Harder"--Part II. ˜The œComputing teacher. 16(9). 25–29. 9 indexed citations
20.
Anderson‐Inman, Lynne. (1981). Transenvironmental Programming: Promoting Success in the Regular Class by Maximizing the Effect of Resource Room Instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology. 4(4). 3–12. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026