Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Managing for Organizational Integrity.
1994554 citationsLynn Sharp PaineHarvard business reviewprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Lynn Sharp Paine Lynn Sharp Paine (= 1×)
peers
Carroll U. Stephens
Countries citing papers authored by Lynn Sharp Paine
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynn Sharp Paine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynn Sharp Paine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynn Sharp Paine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lynn Sharp Paine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynn Sharp Paine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynn Sharp Paine. The network helps show where Lynn Sharp Paine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynn Sharp Paine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynn Sharp Paine.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynn Sharp Paine based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lynn Sharp Paine. Lynn Sharp Paine is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Bower, Joseph L., Herman B. Leonard, & Lynn Sharp Paine. (2011). Capitalism at Risk: Rethinking the Role of Business. Medical Entomology and Zoology.20 indexed citations
2.
Spitzeck, Heiko, Michael Pirson, Julian Nida‐Rümelin, et al.. (2009). Humanism in Business. Cambridge University Press eBooks.45 indexed citations
Paine, Lynn Sharp, et al.. (2008). Note on the Law of Sexual Harassment.1 indexed citations
5.
Paine, Lynn Sharp. (2000). Does Ethics Pay?. Business Ethics Quarterly. 10(1). 319–330.1 indexed citations
6.
Paine, Lynn Sharp. (2000). Does Ethics Pay?. Business Ethics Quarterly. 10(1). 319–330.65 indexed citations
7.
Barlow, John Perry, Marci A. Hamilton, Justin Hughes, et al.. (1997). Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas.16 indexed citations
Paine, Lynn Sharp. (1996). Cases in Leadership, Ethics, and Organizational Integrity: A Strategic Perspective. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).39 indexed citations
11.
Paine, Lynn Sharp. (1994). Managing for Organizational Integrity.. Harvard business review. 72(2). 106–117.554 indexed citations breakdown →
Paine, Lynn Sharp. (1991). Trade secrets and the justification of intellectual property: A comment on Hettinger. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 20(3).16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.