Louise Peck
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 1%
- Physiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Martha A. BeluryCarla PortocarreroKwangok P. NickelKaren L. HouseknechtJohn P. Vanden HeuvelSilvia Y. Moya-CamarenaJohn BurgessLaura J. Stevens
- Topics
- Fatty Acid Research and Health (5 papers)Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (4 papers)Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Clinical NutritionBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Louise Peck
15 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Nutrition and Dietetics 708
- Physiology 250
- Molecular Biology 228
- Biochemistry 216
- Psychiatry and Mental health 192
Countries citing papers authored by Louise Peck
This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Peck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Peck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Peck. The network helps show where Louise Peck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise Peck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise Peck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise Peck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louise Peck. Louise Peck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 213 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 154 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid Normalizes Impaired Glucose Tolerance in the Zucker Diabetic Fattyfa/faRatbreakdown → | 531 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 15 |
About Louise Peck
Louise Peck is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Nutrition and Dietetics and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatty Acid Research and Health (5 papers), Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education (4 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (708 citations), Biochemistry (216 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (192 citations). Louise Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martha A. Belury, Carla Portocarrero, Kwangok P. Nickel, Karen L. Houseknecht, John P. Vanden Heuvel, Silvia Y. Moya-Camarena, John Burgess, Laura J. Stevens, Wen Zhang and Wen Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and American Journal of Kidney Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.