Linda Hobbs

1.4k total citations
51 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

Linda Hobbs is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Linda Hobbs has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Education, 7 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Linda Hobbs's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (18 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (9 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers). Linda Hobbs is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (18 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (9 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (9 papers). Linda Hobbs collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Linda Hobbs's co-authors include Sandra Herbert, John Kenny, Coral Campbell, Christine Redman, Raphaela Porsch, Gail Chittleborough, Russell Tytler, Vaughan Prain, Mellita Jones and Günter Törner and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the IEEE, Computer and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Linda Hobbs

48 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Linda Hobbs Australia 13 443 79 66 60 46 51 609
Kristin Lesseig United States 15 622 1.4× 181 2.3× 52 0.8× 30 0.5× 72 1.6× 36 754
Joan Ferrini‐Mundy United States 16 778 1.8× 139 1.8× 48 0.7× 82 1.4× 44 1.0× 32 951
Valerie K. Otero United States 16 834 1.9× 290 3.7× 38 0.6× 49 0.8× 46 1.0× 44 981
Tamara Holmlund Nelson United States 17 764 1.7× 276 3.5× 85 1.3× 65 1.1× 64 1.4× 26 959
Jane E. Pollock United Kingdom 5 645 1.5× 246 3.1× 36 0.5× 55 0.9× 36 0.8× 8 856
Shelly Sheats Harkness United States 10 679 1.5× 185 2.3× 83 1.3× 43 0.7× 85 1.8× 37 894
Aki Murata United States 11 816 1.8× 206 2.6× 32 0.5× 126 2.1× 26 0.6× 16 909
José Miguel Vílchez González Spain 8 353 0.8× 168 2.1× 83 1.3× 34 0.6× 40 0.9× 34 576
David Pugalee United States 15 775 1.7× 266 3.4× 24 0.4× 34 0.6× 63 1.4× 65 945
Aisling Leavy Ireland 18 927 2.1× 119 1.5× 21 0.3× 101 1.7× 22 0.5× 81 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Hobbs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Hobbs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Hobbs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Hobbs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Hobbs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Hobbs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Hobbs. The network helps show where Linda Hobbs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Hobbs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Hobbs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Hobbs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Hobbs. Linda Hobbs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Xu, Lihua, Jan van Driel, Linda Hobbs, et al.. (2025). A Conceptual Framework for Fostering Gender Equity in Early Years STEM Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 23(7). 2951–2973. 1 indexed citations
2.
Quinn, Frances & Linda Hobbs. (2024). “I’m on My Own and I’m Not Trained”: A Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Analysis of Teaching Mathematics Out-of-Field in a Small School. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 23(1). 1–23. 3 indexed citations
3.
Kewalramani, Sarika, et al.. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Role of Multimodal Resources for Inclusive STEM Engagement in Early-Childhood Education. Education Sciences. 14(6). 604–604. 4 indexed citations
4.
Hobbs, Linda, et al.. (2024). Profiling the status of out-of-field teaching in Western Australia: graduate teacher and principal perspectives. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 52(3). 366–388. 2 indexed citations
5.
Blackmore, Jill, Linda Hobbs, & Julie Rowlands. (2023). Aspiring teachers, financial incentives, and principals’ recruitment practices in hard-to-staff schools. Journal of Education Policy. 39(2). 233–252. 19 indexed citations
6.
Millar, Victoria, Linda Hobbs, Chris Speldewinde, & Jan van Driel. (2022). Stakeholder perceptions of mentoring in developing girls’ STEM identities: “you do not have to be the textbook scientist with a white coat”. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. 11(4). 398–413. 3 indexed citations
7.
Xu, Lihua, et al.. (2022). The Relevance of STEM: a Case Study of an Australian Secondary School as an Arena of STEM Curriculum Innovation and Enactment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 21(2). 667–689. 6 indexed citations
8.
Hobbs, Linda & Raphaela Porsch. (2021). Teaching out-of-field: challenges for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education. 44(5). 601–610. 24 indexed citations
9.
Hobbs, Linda & Frances Quinn. (2020). Out-of-field teachers as learners: Influences on teacher perceived capacity and enjoyment over time. European Journal of Teacher Education. 44(5). 627–651. 11 indexed citations
10.
Hobbs, Linda & Günter Törner. (2019). Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field”: International Perspectives on Teaching as a Non-specialist. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 5 indexed citations
11.
Herbert, Sandra & Linda Hobbs. (2017). Pre-Service Teachers’ Views of School-Based Approaches to Pre-Service Primary Science Teacher Education. Research in Science Education. 48(4). 777–809. 14 indexed citations
12.
Hobbs, Linda, et al.. (2017). Girls' Future — Our Future. Own your potential (DEAKIN). 3 indexed citations
13.
Clark, John Cripps, et al.. (2016). A pedagogy for epistemic agency in the judgment of accuracy and reliability. 11(2). 27–47. 3 indexed citations
14.
Hobbs, Linda, M. Gail Jones, John Kenny, et al.. (2016). Successful university-school partnerships - An interpretive framework. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
15.
Kenny, John, et al.. (2015). Establishing school university partnerships to teach science – Does what worked for us work for you?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2029–2040. 1 indexed citations
16.
Hobbs, Linda. (2013). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers : locating learning possibilities amid disruption. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 7–28. 4 indexed citations
17.
Hobbs, Linda. (2012). Teaching Out-of-Field: Factors Shaping Identities of Secondary Science and Mathematics.. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 58(1). 21–29. 39 indexed citations
18.
Hobbs, Linda, et al.. (2012). Narrative Pedagogies in Science, Mathematics and Technology. Research in Science Education. 43(3). 1289–1305. 10 indexed citations
19.
Tytler, Russell & Linda Hobbs. (2011). The Australian science curriculum. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 2 indexed citations
20.
Hobbs, Linda. (1973). B73-6 Computing Terminals: International Computer State of the Art Report. IEEE Transactions on Computers. C-22(4). 429–430.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026