Leah P. McCoy
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tina L. HeafnerJohn K. BurtonMichael Orey
- Topics
- Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers)Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers)Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Leah P. McCoy
26 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Education 202
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 113
- Computer Science Applications 54
- Statistics and Probability 46
- Gender Studies 44
Countries citing papers authored by Leah P. McCoy
This map shows the geographic impact of Leah P. McCoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah P. McCoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah P. McCoy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leah P. McCoy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah P. McCoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah P. McCoy. The network helps show where Leah P. McCoy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leah P. McCoy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leah P. McCoy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leah P. McCoy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leah P. McCoy. Leah P. McCoy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 59 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Technology and the Academic and Social Culture of a University Campus | 4 |
| 6 | The Digital Divide in Native American Tribal Schools: Two Case Studies. | 1 |
| 7 | Gender Differences in Computer Use and Attitudes on a Ubiquitous Computing Campus | 6 |
| 8 | Computer Skills and Instructional Activities of Student Teachers and Cooperating Teachers | 4 |
| 9 | Gender Differences in Preservice Teachers' Computer and Internet Attitudes | 1 |
| 10 | Studies in Teaching. | 3 |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | Studies in Teaching. 1996 Research Digest. | 14 |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Correlates of Mathematics Anxiety. | 13 |
| 17 | The effect of geometry tool software on high school geometry achievement | 21 |
| 18 | Determinants of Computer Use by Teachers. | 4 |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Leah P. McCoy
Leah P. McCoy is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Gender Studies and Education, having authored 28 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (54 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (113 citations) and Education (202 citations). Leah P. McCoy has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tina L. Heafner, John K. Burton and Michael Orey. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Educational Research, School Science and Mathematics and Computers in the Schools.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.