Léa Lacerenza

832 total citations
9 papers, 593 citations indexed

About

Léa Lacerenza is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Léa Lacerenza has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 593 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 5 papers in Statistics and Probability and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Léa Lacerenza's work include Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (5 papers). Léa Lacerenza is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (9 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (5 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (5 papers). Léa Lacerenza collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Léa Lacerenza's co-authors include Maureen W. Lovett, Susan L. Borden, Jan C. Frijters, Nancy Benson, Karen A. Steinbach, Rose A. Sevcik, Robin D. Morris and Maryanne Wolf and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Developmental Psychology and Teaching and Teacher Education.

In The Last Decade

Léa Lacerenza

9 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Léa Lacerenza Canada 7 559 294 244 67 34 9 593
Sheetal Sood United States 7 344 0.6× 349 1.2× 259 1.1× 40 0.6× 17 0.5× 10 540
Patricia Lindamood United States 6 814 1.5× 429 1.5× 337 1.4× 118 1.8× 25 0.7× 7 881
Melissa Romain United States 8 550 1.0× 267 0.9× 246 1.0× 58 0.9× 31 0.9× 8 603
Leilani Sáez United States 7 404 0.7× 161 0.5× 168 0.7× 114 1.7× 18 0.5× 16 485
Alison Madelaine Australia 15 442 0.8× 365 1.2× 145 0.6× 51 0.8× 26 0.8× 50 545
Miya Miura Wayman United States 8 350 0.6× 196 0.7× 152 0.6× 32 0.5× 27 0.8× 8 428
Eric Lundquist United States 5 552 1.0× 239 0.8× 247 1.0× 181 2.7× 30 0.9× 6 615
Michal Shany Israel 12 562 1.0× 251 0.9× 205 0.8× 142 2.1× 32 0.9× 21 635
Shirley V. Dickson United States 8 509 0.9× 370 1.3× 155 0.6× 40 0.6× 14 0.4× 12 595
Benjamin Silberglitt United States 12 471 0.8× 363 1.2× 191 0.8× 30 0.4× 26 0.8× 16 588

Countries citing papers authored by Léa Lacerenza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Léa Lacerenza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Léa Lacerenza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Léa Lacerenza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Léa Lacerenza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Léa Lacerenza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Léa Lacerenza. The network helps show where Léa Lacerenza may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Léa Lacerenza

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Léa Lacerenza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Léa Lacerenza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Léa Lacerenza. Léa Lacerenza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lovett, Maureen W., Jan C. Frijters, Karen A. Steinbach, et al.. (2022). Interpreting comprehension outcomes after multiple-component reading intervention for children and adolescents with reading disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences. 100. 102224–102224. 3 indexed citations
2.
Lovett, Maureen W., et al.. (2011). Evaluating the Efficacy of Remediation for Struggling Readers in High School. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 45(2). 151–169. 41 indexed citations
3.
Lovett, Maureen W., et al.. (2008). Interventions for Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 41(4). 333–352. 58 indexed citations
4.
Lovett, Maureen W., et al.. (2007). Preparing teachers to remediate reading disabilities in high school: What is needed for effective professional development?. Teaching and Teacher Education. 24(4). 1083–1097. 28 indexed citations
5.
Lovett, Maureen W., et al.. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 92(2). 263–283. 5 indexed citations
6.
Lovett, Maureen W., Léa Lacerenza, & Susan L. Borden. (2000). Putting Struggling Readers on the PHAST Track. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 33(5). 458–476. 98 indexed citations
7.
Lovett, Maureen W., et al.. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 92(2). 263–283. 152 indexed citations
8.
Lovett, Maureen W., et al.. (1996). Text Comprehension Training for Disabled Readers: An Evaluation of Reciprocal Teaching and Text Analysis Training Programs. Brain and Language. 54(3). 447–480. 23 indexed citations
9.
Lovett, Maureen W., et al.. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs.. Developmental Psychology. 30(6). 805–822. 185 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026