Kendra L. Read

23 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Kendra L. Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Clinical Psychology 337
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 165
  • Applied Psychology 46
  • Speech and Hearing 56
  • General Health Professions 111
Replace Samantha R. Fordwood with:
Samantha R. Fordwood United States
Leslie Rith‐Najarian United States
Lauren C. Santucci United States
Kelly L. Drake United States
Alison L. Shortt Australia
Kelsie H. Okamura United States
Yael Holoshitz United States
Madelaine R. Abel United States
Sonia L. Rubens United States
Nancy A. Tashman United States
Kendra L. Read relative to Samantha R. Fordwood United States Samantha R. Fordwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Samantha R. Fordwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kendra L. Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kendra L. Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kendra L. Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kendra L. Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kendra L. Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kendra L. Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kendra L. Read. The network helps show where Kendra L. Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kendra L. Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kendra L. Read Line = papers co-authored together Kendra L. Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201293
2 201569
3 201365
4 201743
5 201343
6 201437
7 201336
8 201334
9 201333
10 201528
11 201425
12 201417
13 201216
14 201915
15 202212
16 202111
17 201710
18 20167
19 20135
20 20205

About Kendra L. Read

Kendra L. Read is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Youth Substance Use and School Attendance (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (337 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (165 citations), Applied Psychology (46 citations), Speech and Hearing (56 citations) and General Health Professions (111 citations). Kendra L. Read has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Philip C. Kendall, Douglas M. Brodman, Matthew P. Mychailyszyn, Rinad S. Beidas, Vanesa A. Mora Ringle, Julie M. Edmunds, Paul J. Veugelers, Jessie‐Lee D. McIsaac, Sara Kirk and Jonathan S. Comer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Prevention Science, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research and Implementation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact