Anna J. Swan
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Philip C. KendallAndres De Los ReyesMichael Van WieSarah A. ThomasMatthew M. CarperKatherine B. EhrlichSamantha E. DaruwalaWilliam V. Lechner
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyBehavior TherapyClinical Psychology Science and Practice
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Anna J. Swan
12 papers receiving 431 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Clinical Psychology 374
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 145
- Education 131
- Social Psychology 94
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 77
Countries citing papers authored by Anna J. Swan
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna J. Swan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna J. Swan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna J. Swan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna J. Swan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna J. Swan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna J. Swan. The network helps show where Anna J. Swan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna J. Swan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna J. Swan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna J. Swan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna J. Swan. Anna J. Swan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 143 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 42 |
About Anna J. Swan
Anna J. Swan is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (374 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (145 citations) and Applied Psychology (33 citations). Anna J. Swan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip C. Kendall, Andres De Los Reyes, Michael Van Wie, Sarah A. Thomas, Matthew M. Carper, Katherine B. Ehrlich, Samantha E. Daruwala, William V. Lechner, Amelia Aldao and Robert L. Findling. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Behavior Therapy and Clinical Psychology Science and Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.