This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Roberts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Roberts. The network helps show where Kelly Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelly Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelly Roberts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelly Roberts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kelly Roberts. Kelly Roberts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Park, Hye Jin, et al.. (2018). Internship to Improve Postsecondary Persistence for Students with Disabilities in the STEM Pipeline (Practice Brief).. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 31(2). 179–185.2 indexed citations
4.
Park, Hye Jin, et al.. (2017). The Effects of Professional Development on Universal Design for Instruction on Faculty Perception and Practice.. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 30(2). 123–139.7 indexed citations
Roberts, Kelly & Robert A. Stodden. (2014). Research Synthesis on Assistive Technology use by People with Learning Disabilities and Difficulties. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 1(2).3 indexed citations
7.
Park, Hye Jin, et al.. (2014). Using Kurzweil 3000 as a Reading Intervention for High School Struggling Readers: Results of a Research Study. CSUN ScholarWorks (California State University, Northridge).1 indexed citations
Marginson, Simon, et al.. (2013). STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report.. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).92 indexed citations
10.
Park, Hye Jin, Kelly Roberts, & Robert A. Stodden. (2012). Practice Brief: Faculty Perspectives on Professional Development to Improve Efficacy when Teaching Students with Disabilities.. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 25(4). 377–383.10 indexed citations
11.
Roberts, Kelly & Susanne Owen. (2012). Innovative Education: A Review of the Literature.7 indexed citations
12.
Roberts, Kelly, et al.. (2012). Use of mobile devices in extension and agricultural production - a case study..8 indexed citations
Roberts, Kelly, et al.. (2011). Universal Design for Instruction in Postsecondary Education: A Systematic Review of Empirically Based Articles.. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 24(1). 5–15.80 indexed citations
Roberts, Kelly, et al.. (2010). Effectiveness of Text-to-Speech Software Features for Improving Vocabulary, Reading Comprehension, and Reading Rate of Culturally Diverse High School Students in Hawai’i. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2010(1). 1606–1611.3 indexed citations
17.
Roberts, Kelly, et al.. (2010). Mentoring Individuals with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education: A Review of the Literature.. The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 23(2). 98–111.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.