Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Applying Thematic Analysis to Education: A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research
2020325 citationsWen Xu, Katina ZammitInternational Journal of Qualitative Methodsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Katina Zammit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katina Zammit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katina Zammit more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katina Zammit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katina Zammit. The network helps show where Katina Zammit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katina Zammit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katina Zammit.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katina Zammit based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Katina Zammit. Katina Zammit is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Xu, Wen & Katina Zammit. (2020). Applying Thematic Analysis to Education: A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 19.325 indexed citations breakdown →
Lirola, María Martínez & Katina Zammit. (2017). Disempowerment and Inspiration: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Immigrant Women in the Spanish and Australian Online Press.7 indexed citations
Zammit, Katina. (2016). Responding to literature: iPads, apps and multimodal text creation. 24(2). 8.1 indexed citations
7.
Tan, Lynde & Katina Zammit. (2016). Defining language and literacy. 3–12.3 indexed citations
8.
Zammit, Katina & Lynde Tan. (2016). The teaching and learning cycle in composing multimodal texts. 43–59.1 indexed citations
9.
Vickers, Margaret H. & Katina Zammit. (2015). Defying the Odds: Promoting Success for Refugee Background and Non-English Speaking Background (NESB) First-year Students Through Peer Support: Final Report.1 indexed citations
10.
McCarthy, Florence E., Margaret H. Vickers, & Katina Zammit. (2014). Facilitators as pedagogical leaders : the acquisition of requisite forms of capital in university settings. 88–99.1 indexed citations
11.
Callow, Jon & Katina Zammit. (2012). 'Where lies your text?' (Twelfth night act I, scene V) : engaging high school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds in reading multimodal texts. English in Australia. 47(2). 69–77.13 indexed citations
Zammit, Katina. (2007). Teaching and leading for quality Australian schools: a review and synthesis of research-based knowledge.26 indexed citations
17.
Zammit, Katina & Toni Downes. (2002). New learning environments and the multiliterate individual : a framework for educators. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 25(2). 24–36.24 indexed citations
18.
Callow, Jon & Katina Zammit. (2002). Visual literacy : from picture books to electronic texts.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.